Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Grow\s+Light\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Grow\s+Light\s+RFI\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:59:45 +0000; This article appeared on the police.com website about a year ago: http://www.policeone.com/drug-interdiction-narcotics/articles/8224280-How-cops-are-catching-grow-ops-with-AM-radios If ARRL, NAB and; /archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00043.html (8,406 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:14:50 -0700; Hi Don, Here is an update for the group concerning grow light ballasts. I have posted links to two commercial filters and an EMI test of a Galaxy ballast. The link to my web site is: http://tomthomps; /archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00053.html (9,842 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:32:42 -0600; I'm dealing with a neighbor's grow lights at the moment. Fortunately they are being very cooperative. I tried the Revolution filter listed in one of the links. It did not help. Coincidently, just yes; /archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00054.html (10,496 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:52:54 -0800; Please do post the results... I have been looking for a RF quiet device to recommend... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net For MixW support see; http; /archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00056.html (12,180 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:04:30 -0700; Hi Larry, I have not tried any of the commercial filters, however, Kevin Jones, W7LOZ, reduced his neighbor's ballast RFI by 30 dB using the Revolution filter. The RFI reduction must be dependent on; /archives//html/RFI/2016-01/msg00057.html (11,862 bytes)
6. [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:27:25 -0500; Is there a list of ballasts that Don't cause RFI? 73, Roger _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00000.html (6,257 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:32:11 -0700; Roger, Here is an independent lab evaluation of a Galaxy ballast the may be a good bet. http://tomthompson.com/radio/GrowLight/RFI_Tests_Galaxy_902220_FCC-Report.pdf Tom W0IVJ 73, Roger _____________; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00001.html (7,269 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:09:04 -0500; Tom, It looks like there were three test runs conducted. The tabular data shows the lowest frequency tested was 14 megahertz, in runs 1 and 2. The graphic data results show lower frequencies though.; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00002.html (8,427 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:30:27 -0500; Ed, Understood, and thank you. The metodology is not my question, though. I still ask: what was the lowest frequency swept? I infer from the tiny graph it was around 300 khz, but did not catch any; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00003.html (10,480 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:56:31 -0700; Scott, I have not tested the Galaxy ballast, but all the ballasts I have encountered, which include the Lumatek LK1000, the Micromole 1000, and the Quantum Series, will not meet FCC specifications I; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00004.html (11,974 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:47:59 -0800; Hi Scott, I suggest that you get advice from ARRL and W1RFI on the wording of your ordinance. I suspect that they will advise you to avoid suggesting any specific products, and also that they will ad; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00005.html (11,511 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:56:26 +0000; As RF lighting devices, they fall under Part 18 of the rules. These are somewhat lower than Part 15. Neither Part 15 nor Part 18 levels are sufficient to protect against all interference, and in some; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00006.html (13,407 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 16:57:04 -0500; Jim, Actually we are well beyond the formative period for this ordinance. It has been in place for about a year-and-a-half. I did request advice from ARRL before I wrote the ordinance. Their's was; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00007.html (14,255 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:53:22 -0700; Scott, Does your ordinance apply just to marijuana grow light ballasts? Tom Actually we are well beyond the formative period for this ordinance. It has been in place for about a year-and-a-half. I di; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00008.html (14,072 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:45:38 -0500; Dear Group, If anyone else is interested in this contact me directly, off list. We can stay if the body thinks this merits the bandwidth on the list, but sometimes the culture of Yahoo groups deman; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00009.html (16,567 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Mike - W5JR <w5jr.lists@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 15:18:55 -0500; Scott (and whom ever), I do public policy stuff for my company (the one referenced in your tag line). I'll PM you to dialogue further. Great to know a fellow ham is at the controls of at least one en; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00010.html (8,217 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] Grow light RFI (score: 1): Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 19:28:57 -0800; I would like to see the discussion stay on list... 73s and thanks, Dave NK7Z http://www.nk7z.net Dear Group, If anyone else is interested in this contact me directly, off list. We can stay if the bod; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00011.html (15,245 bytes)
18. [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 08:48:34 -0500; Deer Group, I think I have emailed our Medical Marijuana Zoning and Licensing Ordinances to everyone who requested them. If I missed anyone, please speak up. Scott ________________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00021.html (7,987 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:00:12 -0500; Voice to Text... gotta love it. Dear group - Not the four-legged kind. Hi hi. Scott Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® II, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone I think I have emailed our Medical Marijuana Zonin; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00022.html (8,893 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] Grow Light RFI (score: 1): Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:16:28 +0000 (UTC); Could have been "Deere group" Farmer Mike73, AD6AA I think I have emailed our Medical Marijuana Zoning and Licensing Ordinances to everyone who requested them. If I missed anyone, please speak up.; /archives//html/RFI/2016-12/msg00023.html (8,830 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]