Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+HDTV\:\s+Plasma\s+vs\s+LCD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+HDTV\:\s+Plasma\s+vs\s+LCD\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:19:19 -0600; Mike, They most likely DO pass "testing standards". That shows what a piss poor job the FCC has done with regards to emissions on so many devices. Remember, the "warning" label on Part 15 and similar; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00139.html (12,393 bytes)
22. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:53:18 -0500; TV receivers are not tested for radiated emissions below 30 MHz. From FCC MP-3: http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/measurement/mp3/mp3-1985.pdf 8.2 Electromagnetic fie; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00141.html (9,482 bytes)
23. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:00:17 -0800; The initial design would have. What they then have produced, and I've worked for many electronics companies and seen it, is a completely different and irrelevant story. Kurt ________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00142.html (8,271 bytes)
24. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:36:23 -0600; Cortland, Thank you for reinforcing my point about the FCC's deplorable lack of guts and common sense with emissions. The situation for TV receivers, plus the general lack of radiated emissions requi; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00147.html (11,028 bytes)
25. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:00:50 -0500; Hi Dale, Far nicer--and it would surely drive the message home better than anything else--would be if some critical government installation happened to be located next to a suburban build-up, and hav; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00148.html (10,045 bytes)
26. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:58 -0500; Thank you for reinforcing my point about the FCC's deplorable lack of guts and common sense with emissions. The situation for TV receivers, plus the general lack of radiated emissions requirements te; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00149.html (13,589 bytes)
27. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:30:13 -0600; Eddy, Actually, an incident along the lines of what you say actually did happen to the FCC itself a number of years ago in the Chicago area. Up until late 1999, I lived in the far NW Chicago suburbs; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00151.html (12,414 bytes)
28. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:44:33 -0500; Hi Dale, That's really quite the story...! In that instance the "...tail actually wagged the dog" for a change--too bad the powers-that-be never learned much from the experience, though... I recall k; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00153.html (12,407 bytes)
29. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:10:48 -0600; It's a political appointment, even though he's retired from his FCC work maybe Riley H. has a chance. If we write some letters... :) We need someone like him to grab the bull by the horns and get the; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00158.html (9,159 bytes)
30. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:16:59 -0600; I'm reasonably sure that the FCC's regulatory policy is about the same regardless of the administration. Like Roger said, lack of guts has nothing to do with the FCCs regulatory policy. For decades,; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00159.html (12,096 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]