Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+I\.\s+C\.\s+E\.\s+products\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+I\.\s+C\.\s+E\.\s+products\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: rrath@charter.net; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:29:06 -0800; Go to this site: http://www.iceradioproducts.com/filtersrf.html#1 and look at the products. Any one using any of these items? If so, please contact me off list as I have questions for you. Thank you.; /archives//html/RFI/2007-12/msg00069.html (6,858 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:42:50 -0800; I'm a member of NCCC, the Northern California Contest Club. A question was recently asked on our reflector about the merits of various BPF filter sets. ICE RF bandpass filters are fairly well regarde; /archives//html/RFI/2007-12/msg00070.html (7,487 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:11:24 -0800; Not quite -- the sample of NCCC members on the reflector do. And our comments are on the RF bandpass filters, NOT the power filters. Danny, K6MHE, just sent me some very disturbing comments about wha; /archives//html/RFI/2007-12/msg00074.html (8,377 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:30:22 -0500; I've dissected a different ICE unit - the 348 Surge Protector. See http://blog.aa6e.net/2005/03/ice-348-surge-protector.html . I was not too happy with the "build quality", but I'm using these for my; /archives//html/RFI/2007-12/msg00076.html (7,982 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: "Juan EA5RS" <ea5rs@ono.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:49:52 +0100; I have recently measured a couple of ICEs419 (6 band switched BPF) and a Dunestar600 (similar to the 419) with an accurrate Vector Network Analyzer. While frequency response is similar between both m; /archives//html/RFI/2008-01/msg00003.html (8,418 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:54:21 -0500; Just curious ... Are the Dunestar and W3NQN filters also 150W max., same as the ICE models? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Sent Using: ChurchPup-Linux http://www.churchpup.com/ Personal: http://bibleseve; /archives//html/RFI/2008-01/msg00004.html (7,722 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] I. C. E. products question (score: 1): Author: "Juan EA5RS" <ea5rs@ono.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:58:44 +0100; Dunestar 200w (as stated in Power Ratings chapter in manual) W3NQN 200w (not 100% sure) But those figures might not be very significant, Under a severe load mismatch, their worst case condition as fa; /archives//html/RFI/2008-01/msg00005.html (8,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]