Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Is\s+it\s+true\s+this\s+is\s+\"immune\"\s+to\s+generating\s+RFI\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:25:53 -0400
http://www.instructables.com/id/Power-Over-Ethernet-PoE-Adapter/ -- Thanks! & 73, KD4E.com David Colburn nevils-station.com I don't google I SEARCH! duckduckgo.com Network: groups.yahoo.com/group/qrv
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00044.html (6,916 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:45:20 -0700
I've run into PeE systems that were VERY VERY VERY noisy on HF. I didn't bother to stick around to fix them, but I suspect they might have been a candidate for the bucket treatment. 73, Jim k9YC ___
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00045.html (7,490 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:55:48 -0400
Maybe I missed it because I only took time to skim, but I didn't see where it said anything about not *generating* RFI. I saw one comment that said something about ethernet not being particularly pro
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00084.html (8,848 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:34:32 -0400
They seem to be somewhat careless in their use of terms so that it quickly becomes unclear when they refer to incoming vs outgoing RFI/interference ... -- whitewolf499 says: Apr 25, 2013. 11:03 AMRep
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00085.html (12,362 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu