- 1. [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
- Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:25:53 -0400
- http://www.instructables.com/id/Power-Over-Ethernet-PoE-Adapter/ -- Thanks! & 73, KD4E.com David Colburn nevils-station.com I don't google I SEARCH! duckduckgo.com Network: groups.yahoo.com/group/qrv
- /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00044.html (6,916 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:45:20 -0700
- I've run into PeE systems that were VERY VERY VERY noisy on HF. I didn't bother to stick around to fix them, but I suspect they might have been a candidate for the bucket treatment. 73, Jim k9YC ___
- /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00045.html (7,490 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
- Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:55:48 -0400
- Maybe I missed it because I only took time to skim, but I didn't see where it said anything about not *generating* RFI. I saw one comment that said something about ethernet not being particularly pro
- /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00084.html (8,848 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] Is it true this is "immune" to generating RFI? (score: 1)
- Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:34:32 -0400
- They seem to be somewhat careless in their use of terms so that it quickly becomes unclear when they refer to incoming vs outgoing RFI/interference ... -- whitewolf499 says: Apr 25, 2013. 11:03 AMRep
- /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00085.html (12,362 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu