Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+KG2V\'s\s+new\s+RFI\s+rule\s+of\s+thumb\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+KG2V\'s\s+new\s+RFI\s+rule\s+of\s+thumb\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] KG2V's new RFI rule of thumb... (score: 1): Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:05:26 -0400; I've come up with a new rule of thumb: If the manufacturer puts a ferrite on the leads of a device, it isn't enough, and the item is an RFI bomb -- 73 de KG2V - Charles Gallo Quality Custom Machine-s; /archives//html/RFI/2013-08/msg00032.html (6,623 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] KG2V's new RFI rule of thumb... (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stevens <jeff@mossycup.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:29:52 -0400; This really strikes me as a rule of thumb with a large kernel of truth to it. Having to choke external leads simply suggests that the product could have been engineered better from the start. One of; /archives//html/RFI/2013-08/msg00033.html (8,327 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] KG2V's new RFI rule of thumb... (score: 1): Author: Dale <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:05:41 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Gentlemen, To a great extent, I also agree with Charlie's "rule". However, the REAL problem exists in two areas: regulatory bodies (such as the FCC and the EU Commission, among others) and manufactur; /archives//html/RFI/2013-08/msg00034.html (13,255 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] KG2V's new RFI rule of thumb... (score: 1): Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 05:53:39 -0400; Anecdote: I was once called to a Ham EMI complaint involving one of my then-employers pole and wire-mounted subscriber equipments; a harmonic of its 1.024 MHz clock was interfering with a 2 meter rep; /archives//html/RFI/2013-08/msg00038.html (8,030 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]