Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Modem\s+PS\s+noise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Modem\s+PS\s+noise\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Modem PS noise (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:07:31 -0800 (PST); I finally got a well enough regulated 5V non-switching PS to power up my 2 Wire 2701 Modem. The S-9+ noise on 160m is completely gone. I tried a little bypass capacitor on the switching transistor wh; /archives//html/RFI/2008-03/msg00010.html (7,104 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Modem PS noise (score: 1): Author: dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com; Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:29:58 -0600; Note to Rick and All, Placing a bypass cap across the switching transistor of a switch mode power supply is NOT the place to put a cap, as Rick found out. There will be a snubber cap already included; /archives//html/RFI/2008-03/msg00011.html (10,108 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Modem PS noise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:42:49 -0800; And I'll emphasize two VERY important phrases in Dale's preceding sentence, that he clearly understands but didn't articulate in detail -- "in the correct places" and "good board layout techniques."; /archives//html/RFI/2008-03/msg00012.html (7,863 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Modem PS noise (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:40:26 -0500; Anyone know if the Pyramid PS-32LAB followed good design protocols? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Free OS : http://www.ChurchPup.com Based on: http://www.PuppyLinux.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com/k; /archives//html/RFI/2008-03/msg00013.html (7,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]