Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Not\s+your\s+typical\s+invisible\s+fence\s+RFI\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:23:22 -0500
I just uploaded a video onto YouTube that documents wideband RFI on 20 meters that I tracked down to my neighbors invisible fence transmitter, and it's not the typical approximate 7 or 10 KHz interva
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00031.html (8,736 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:19 +0000
I haven't used our Invisible Fence system for several years, but it did generate RFI. I easily stopped it with a Corcom AC line filter. 73, Jim N7US I just uploaded a video onto YouTube that document
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00032.html (8,896 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:59:24 -0500
Hi Don - Interesting! Years ago, when I got my first Invisible-Fence brand system in my old house, I wondered if it would be a problem, but was told that the underground loop operated at around 17 KH
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00033.html (10,459 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Bouchard <joek1vw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:41:39 -0500
Don, Our invisible fence is the typical 10khz variety, but I found a 3 layer approach worked well... each did a bit of reduction, and together it was enough. Maybe that multi layer approach can help
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00034.html (10,222 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:03:47 -0500
Hi Joe and gang, Thanks for the comments. I'm not looking for a home brew solution as I already know what a solution is based on my past experiences with invisible fence systems including my own. As
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00035.html (12,930 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:56:46 +0000 (UTC)
Had a problem  with the next door neighbor's inground dog fence. Wiped me out on 160M with a receive antenna within 10' of the buried wire. Provided a Corcom 10VK6 filter to the installer of the dog
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00036.html (12,720 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:05:01 -0500
Hi Tony, Yes, I remember your case. I'm the one that told you about the 10VK6 back in 2016 per a recommendation I had received from the Innotek engineering department. 73, Don (wd8dsb) ______________
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00037.html (13,433 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 18:06:48 +0000
There is no record on the FCC OET site for KE3-3002587 which is shown on the image of the label as the FCC ID number for the wireless transmitter - Part 15, Class B, Subpart B, intentional radiators.
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00038.html (10,994 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 18:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
And thanks again Don for the help. I felt more comfortable with an off the shelf solution and have it installed by the original installer.Easy fix with great results.N2TK, Tony   --Original Message--
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00039.html (13,498 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:43:14 -0500
Hi Tony, Glad to hear the 10VK6 did the trick for you and I thought that was the case. I actually have a 10VK6 sitting here specifically for this application that I can provide the Invisible Fence in
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00040.html (14,921 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:49:47 +0000
I found the certification record easily. https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/reports/Tcb731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COPY&RequestTimeout=500&tcb_code=&application_id=rQqvlnXl0jI%2BsFf%2Fvos1Hw%3D%3D&fcc_id=KE3-3
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00042.html (13,634 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:52:14 +0000
Ed, please let me know why I did not find it under the listing on the OET for the FCC ID number. That is usually where I find such things. Please educate me on how you found it. Dave - WØLEV -- *Dave
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00056.html (14,810 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:59:30 +0000
I didn't have to do anything special, Dave. I just typed in KE3 in the grantee box and scrolled down the resultant list until I saw the full ID number. It was about 75% down the list if 116 items tha
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00060.html (15,521 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:37:15 +0000
My wife sez I'm always in a hurry. Well, she is correct. A search on the specific number did not yield anything. And I did not visually search. As you found, it's there. Next time I'll slow down a bi
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00061.html (16,518 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:48:57 -0500
Here is an interesting update regarding the 20 meters broadband RFI being generated by my neighbors Invisible Fence transmitter that's not the typical RFI encountered with such systems. We tried a br
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00074.html (21,845 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:36:00 -0800
On 1/31/2022 2:48 PM, Don Kirk wrote: I also want Radio Systems Corporation to look into the design of the transmitter regarding why it's generating the 14 MHz broadband trash as it definitely genera
/archives//html/RFI/2022-01/msg00077.html (9,768 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Not your typical invisible fence RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:15:12 -0500
Opps, I just spotted an error in my text. I should have said capacitive reactance and Xc, not inductive reactance and XL (sorry for the error in my text). My calculations were correct, but I went bra
/archives//html/RFI/2022-02/msg00007.html (22,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu