Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Rfi\s+help\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Rfi\s+help\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI Help (score: 1): Author: tduffy <tduffy@sygnet.com> (tduffy); Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 21:53:05 -0500; To: <rfi@contesting.com> -- Submissions: rfi@contesting.com Administrative requests: rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html Questions: owner-rfi@contesting.com; /archives//html/RFI/1998-01/msg00022.html (7,768 bytes)
2. [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Randy Davenport <pastor.spaceboy@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 10:37:02 -0400; I have a major rfi problem. Being disabled and low income i am scrounging around for parts such as snap on or ring ferrites, filters, etc. Can anyone help me out with this? Randy ka4nma _____________; /archives//html/RFI/2019-08/msg00015.html (6,440 bytes)
3. [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Randy Davenport <pastor.spaceboy@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:15:44 -0400; _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2019-08/msg00058.html (6,594 bytes)
4. [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Randy Davenport <pastor.spaceboy@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:06:16 -0400; I have terrible RFI on the hf bands. I can't find it but somewhere I read that rg213 jumpers reduce the RFI Is it true? Randy ka4nma _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list R; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00036.html (6,396 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 11:19:57 -0700; No, but it is true that coax with poorly installed connectors can allow some noise to intrude. Here's a tutorial applications note about finding and killing noise. http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00037.html (7,628 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 11:20:36 -0700; That MAY be true in certain, probably very specific, instances. It is NOT generally true. RG-213 has two shields so this will, possibly, help if the jumpers you are presently using leak badly, but th; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00038.html (8,646 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 12:26:19 -0700; This is NOT generally true. For almost half a century, RG-numbers for popular coax cables have been generic. RG8 and RG213 are used to describe 50 ohm coax with OD in the range of 0.3 to 0.4 inches.; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00039.html (7,871 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 19:55:26 +0000 (UTC); Two - shields? That would be RG-214 Two shields each made of silver-plated copper braid. Inner dielectric dimension is the same as RG-213 cable RG-214 cable good (usable) to 10 GHz per spec sheets. 2; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00040.html (9,866 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:52:06 -0700; Yes, Jim, and we must be absolutely accurate at all times about everything important. Even so, I was wrong: it isn't RG-213 which has two shields: it is RG-214, which I used when setting up satellite; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00041.html (8,267 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:47:11 -0700; Correct. I was wrong. Absolutely correct...and far more costly. Ken W7EKB _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00042.html (7,616 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 21:23:37 +0000; RG-214 has two shields. The inner shield is made of silver-plated copper wires and the outer shield is made of tinned copper wires. Total diameter is nominally .420 inches as opposed to the .405 inch; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00043.html (8,103 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: "chuck.gooden" <chuck.gooden@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 17:26:47 -0500; silver-plated copper braid.> Inner dielectric dimension is the same as RG-213 normal HF operations (single op) RG-214 cable would be significant overkill.Absolutely correct...and far more costly.Ken; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00044.html (8,834 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46:36 -0700; Hi Randy, Do take the time to read Jim's paper on quieting your receiver down... It does help! I have a three part entry on removing RFI from your world at: https://www.nk7z.net/rfi-now-house-cleanin; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00045.html (8,421 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:53:43 -0700; Kennith, I did not take Jim's comment as a request for absolute accuracy... I would hope someone would correct me if I misled a new person with the wrong coax designation. So in this case, I think th; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00046.html (8,546 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 23:18:38 +0000 (UTC); Mac, Where did you find RG214 with two different shield types? I have seen SPC (silver plated copper) only in my 214 cable and in the various 214 data sheets. Two different shield types could affect; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00047.html (10,093 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 23:24:05 +0000 (UTC); Chuck, I have used standard PL-259 ("UHF") connectors on RG-214 cable. Don't tin the braid excessively and it can be worked into the PL-259 connector part with the solder holes. Just don't forget the; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00048.html (9,553 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 17:46:18 -0700; Repeating my earlier comment, which is the most important one -- RG-numbers have not been a spec for half a century. They are a generic descriptor, telling us Zo and approximate o.d., and nothing mor; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00049.html (8,986 bytes)
18. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: "Michael Martin, RFI Services" <mike@rfiservices.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 21:03:38 -0400; Hey guys I don't have time to read all the comments, I used to make a lot of rg214 cables and I always used the same connectors that I used on rg58, I just didn't use a reducer. I would solder the ce; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00050.html (9,498 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:12:12 -0700; On 5/16/2020 6:03 PM, Michael Martin, RFI Services wrote: I used to make a lot of rg214 cables and I always used the same connectors that I used on rg58, I just didn't use a reducer. I would solder t; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00051.html (8,895 bytes)
20. [RFI] Rfi help (score: 1): Author: Kimo Chun <kimochun@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 18:07:07 -1000; I believe I saw, once, a type N-Male connector for RG-214 that had two separate clamping sections, one for each layer of braid. I'd have to go look to see if I have it somewhere. I don't recall if it; /archives//html/RFI/2020-05/msg00052.html (8,967 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]