- 1. [RFI] Solar RFI and the FCC (score: 1)
- Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:18:33 -0400
- All: I certainly agree with Jim's comment about vendors being held accountable for RFI issues. I'll soon have first-hand experience dealing with Solar City, the company who installed my neighbors Sol
- /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00067.html (8,195 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] Solar RFI and the FCC (score: 1)
- Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:49:36 -0700
- Don't waste time with them. Inform them once. Give them a reasonable time frame to resolve it. If it took them a day to install it, they should have it resolved in a day (excluding shipping time of
- /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00069.html (8,231 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] Solar RFI and the FCC (score: 1)
- Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:28:16 +0000
- In the case of power line noise, the FCC typically gives utilities 30 to 60 days to resolve RFI complaints. Even more time is allowed if they provide an explanation and resolution schedule. I suspect
- /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00070.html (11,249 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] Solar RFI and the FCC (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:53:04 -0700
- Tony, Take a look here: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee%20Reports/2016/Jul y/Doc_18_0716.pdf There is quite an interesting write up on FCC enforcement actions regarding RFI on t
- /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00071.html (8,404 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] Solar RFI and the FCC (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:56:53 -0700
- Respectfully, that might not be the best approach... Take a look at the link to the ARRL EMC Committee report, and read the sections on FCC enforcement to see what you are up against first... I wou
- /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00072.html (9,247 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu