Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Tesla\'s\s+Response\s+to\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 19:31:58 -0600
I am glad someone finally said this.. "Also, Solar Edge is the vendor, not the retailer, so they (Green Solar Tech) need to get involved....." OR Installer, and I guess that makes a MAJOR difference.
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00095.html (17,029 bytes)

22. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 02:11:30 +0000
Paul is a good guy as is Ed Hare at the ARRL http://www.arrl.org/edward-f-hare-jr The league is working this issue pretty hard, but since the league is all of us (members anyway) we need to document
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00096.html (17,778 bytes)

23. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 18:53:48 -0800
Is there an appropriate path for sharing? I suspect neither Ed nor Paul, would like getting every RFI report in their respective mail box... As of now, I think the only path for sharing this sort of
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00097.html (19,745 bytes)

24. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Dale Johnson <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:39:51 -0600
It would seem to me this would be a good person to contact and find out what the secret is to installing a quiet system. Also, is solar a good investment for a residental installation in Wisconsin? C
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00098.html (17,500 bytes)

25. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:48:04 -0600
<Respectfully, in every case here but one, (and I have been involved in maybe 10 to 15 in the past three years), the RFI from grow ops were unheard on the AM band with a local station tuned in, and w
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00103.html (9,065 bytes)

26. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:09:51 -0800
Hi Rob, I am not sure how I could be "spectacularly incorrect" in the comment you quoted, when I did not draw a conclusion from the data presented, but reported only what I found... Jim already point
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00105.html (11,839 bytes)

27. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:34:54 +0000
FCC wants to see DATA. If at all possible, travel to a bad site and take data in a rigorous engineering manner for the babies at FCC. Write it up in a technically sound manner. FCC is all lawyers, th
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00112.html (14,638 bytes)

28. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:40:38 +0000
When we resided in the large apartment complex in Lovaland, Colorado, I could not receive an AM station (KCOL) in Fort Collins (transmitter, maybe 10-miles distant) due to RFI throughout the complex.
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00113.html (10,365 bytes)

29. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:42:20 +0000
Actually, we dont mind getting those reports. In general, Solar Edge has been scheduling repairs and getting them done eventually, but if that process fails for any reason, we can talk to Solar Edge
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00169.html (22,176 bytes)

30. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:44:49 +0000
If Tesla gets sued over any of this, absolutely every RFI problem for all time from any of their products, including up-and-coming EV wireless-power-transfer charging devices will be handled by their
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00170.html (11,575 bytes)

31. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:57:14 +0000
Weigh what you just said against the reality that Solar Edge has resolved a number of complaints, typically by replacing all of the equipment and rewiring it. The lawyers would never have allowed tha
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00171.html (11,262 bytes)

32. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:44:23 +0000
The early Solar Edge designs and installations were noisy. When solar first started being deployed, they were the only company that produced noise. Although no process is perfect, they have stepped u
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00190.html (20,012 bytes)

33. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:53:40 +0000
If you contact the FCC, it will probably send the case directly to ARRL. Not many years ago, the FCC did essentially nothing in response to complaints, stating that it didn't have the staff resources
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00192.html (15,149 bytes)

34. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:55:34 +0000
If it's a Solar Edge system, they will work directly with the installer to get the noisy components replaced, filtered and rewired. So far, no neighbor has refused to allow that to happen. Ed Suppose
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00193.html (11,689 bytes)

35. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Eddie Edwards" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:23:34 -0600
I completely agree with you Ed that politicians are never the answer top anything. They are the problem. Early on, these cases will be about a neighbor adding solar panels to their house next door to
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00198.html (17,109 bytes)

36. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 22:35:06 +0000
Actually, yes, they are changing their designs. These field retrofits are expensive. The Lab's W1VLF was on the list to get his own home system upgraded and they replaced the inverter, the optimizers
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00211.html (18,039 bytes)

37. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:38:31 +0000
Two models that were tested in the ARRL Lab were 58 dB over the limits. (They seemed to be the same design, rebranded.) There is no doubt that these would devastate the AM broadcast band. If you are
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00221.html (9,987 bytes)

38. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Gary Johnson <gwj@wb9jps.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:32:28 -0800
TJ Simpson at Solar Edge tells me the new optimizers use spread spectrum modulation to reduce the 200 kHz interference that I am experiencing. In January, he is coming to install those next door. The
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00222.html (9,354 bytes)

39. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 20:14:04 -0600
Two of the EV manufacturers (Tesla and BMW) have solved the problem by not including analog medium wave AM in their car radios. That's their RFI solution--eliminate the cause of complaints. https://w
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00224.html (9,396 bytes)

40. Re: [RFI] Tesla's Response to Solar Panel RFI (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:29:19 +0000
"... yes, they are changing their designs. These field retrofits are expensive." Ed, How expensive are the retrofit kits? I was not talking about "expensive retrofits" being a design change. That ind
/archives//html/RFI/2019-12/msg00225.html (14,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu