Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+The\s+ARRL\s+Contest\s+Update\s+for\s+April\s+1\,\s+2020\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 05:44:17 -0500
Sadly, the qrznow article covered everything except what is really interesting: the mode by which the seemingly incandescent "vintage" bulbs radiated RFI. 73 Rob K5UJ Vintage light bulbs were the ult
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00000.html (6,603 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
On the Ofcom website there is a picture of the spectrum analyzer and an expanded image of the bulb (240V 60W) if one choose to open the picture in a new browser tab. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-of
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00001.html (8,893 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
"Vintage" A modern bulb made to look vintage or "steampunk" may not have been  Incandescent. Probably a "steampunk led bulb". Mike73, AD6AA  73 Rob K5UJ Vintage light bulbs were the ultimate cause of
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00004.html (9,345 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
One may, if interested, check the OFCOM website link I posted earlier and note that picture posted is indeed an incandescent bulb. I still have questions related to how the device produced EMI in the
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00005.html (10,673 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:29:33 +0000
https://www.emcrules.com/2017/04/can-incandescent-light-bulbs-cau<https://www.emcrules.com/2017/04/can-incandescent-light-bulbs-cause.html> se.html<https://www.emcrules.com/2017/04/can-incandescent-l
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00006.html (12,655 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:44:18 +0000 (UTC)
No wonder OFCOM had no further info or speculation; They were dumbfounded by the phenom. Maybe this is why (in part) modern bulbs above 25W have been Argon filled (as well as using a compact, coiled
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00007.html (13,644 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@tds.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:51:10 -0500
I've recently discovered a new type of "Antique String Filament" LED bulbs in the local stores, the internal string of many LEDs are coated with yellow/orange phosphor to give off that "antique warm
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00008.html (12,536 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:42:11 -0700
Wondering why these bulbs are an issue now, when I made several posts regarding them, going back roughly a decade when they began to flood the market, with extreme RFI noted in the VHF airband (where
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00009.html (8,371 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 22:57:04 +0000 (UTC)
Stimulus generalization; the LED types aren't the ones (bulbs) that gave OFCOM the problem. You're going to be figuratively shocked when you finally realize its really a tungsten filament lamp (with
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00010.html (9,821 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 23:15:03 +0000 (UTC)
The answer, Lloyd, appears to be definitively "no". I think the phenom had the OFCOM boys stumped. The link by Ed Hare lead to more links that shed light on the physics (but, you will have to get you
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00011.html (13,934 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:41:40 -0500
Thanks Ed and others. Looks like a problem for VHF hams. https://www.amazon.com/CTKcom-Nostalgic-Tungsten-Incandescent-Industrial/dp/B06XDBDTGN/ref=sr_1_19?qid=1585791373&refinements=p_n_feature_thre
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00012.html (10,217 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 02:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Fortunately, those are not the lamp style the German researchers found troublesome. An up and down filament does not compare to the many up and down filament of the bulbs that interfered. Also, a key
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00013.html (12,011 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] The ARRL Contest Update for April 1, 2020 (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:57:13 -0700
"Guess you are not on an airway frequented by commercial aircraft, as that is who was complaining in Scotland. Besides, you're just a ham, what do you know about it? (from the point of view of offici
/archives//html/RFI/2020-04/msg00014.html (14,505 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu