Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+TinySA\s+as\s+an\s+RFI\s+research\s+tool\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Hugo Loranger <ve2_ugo@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 02:56:39 +0000
Hi, What do you think of TinySA as the main tool for RFI research in order to intervene effectively instead of a simple portable HF radio? 73! Hugo _______________________________________________ RFI
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00048.html (7,597 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:16:33 -0700
Spectrum analyzers and spectrum/waterfalls built into radios are very useful tools, but not if equipment needed to run them are noisy. These two docs list some, also some good battery operated radios
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00049.html (8,583 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:24:20 -0700
I have one, and It's not very sensitive, so a preamp is required. I think a portable receiver, directional antenna and a discerning ear are better tools. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ Hi, What do y
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00050.html (8,289 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:26:11 +0000
Hugo and all, I have looked at and tried the TinySA as an interference testing tool. The sensitivity of the Tiny Sa only goes down to -100 dBm. I was thinking at some point I would add a 20 dB preamp
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00051.html (8,742 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:33:37 +0000
Hi All again, While I am thinking of it I also tried the little radio called a Malachite. It suffers the same problems but is a bit more sensitive than the TinySA. One of these with some sort of ante
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00052.html (9,784 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Hugo Loranger <ve2_ugo@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:52:13 +0000
I don't know if with DX Engineering Portable Receive Preamplifier-Attenuator DXE-NL-PRE-ATT-1 if that would make the product perfect by adding a directional HF and VHF antenna? Hugo Loranger ________
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00053.html (10,420 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:24:53 -0700
Another thing about the Tiny SA is that the screen is very difficult to see in bright light. When you get out in the field tracking down a noise, you will encounter many noise sources. You don't want
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00054.html (12,149 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Dave <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:24:03 -0700
I agree totally with Dave... I looked into this for a brief moment, and came to the conclusion that the tinySA is simply not sensitive enough for this task. See: https://www.nk7z.net/sdr-rfi-survey-p
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00055.html (9,857 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Charles Plunk <af4o@twc.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:50:48 -0500
Lots of good tools available nowadays to track this stuff. Agree Dave. Lots of noise out there. Of the last 2 power line issues I successfully found, the single thing that helped me the most to find
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00056.html (9,915 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: Dave <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:34:24 -0700
Chuck, What a cool idea, RFI from RX in one ear, and re-transmitted RFI in the other... I have to try that. I guess I am lucky... For some reason, (I know not why), I have been able to match RFI sour
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00057.html (11,855 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] TinySA as an RFI research tool (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:06:05 +0000
The Tiny SA is typical of even expensive spectrum analyzers of the past, even HP. They came without a built-in preamp and the noise figure was typically 18 to 22 dB. They needed a preamp, external. E
/archives//html/RFI/2021-06/msg00058.html (8,912 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu