Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+when\s+to\s+apply\s+mitigation\s+techniques\s+to\s+solar\s+array\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+when\s+to\s+apply\s+mitigation\s+techniques\s+to\s+solar\s+array\s+RFI\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] when to apply mitigation techniques to solar array RFI (score: 1): Author: "Jim Spears" <n1nk@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:23:24 -0400; Jim Brown is certainly 110% correct in stating that the design and manufacturing stages are the right place to implement RFI mitigation BUT Those of us who have to deal with the downstream effects of; /archives//html/RFI/2017-03/msg00064.html (7,559 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] when to apply mitigation techniques to solar array RFI (score: 1): Author: Michael Aust <ava622@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:36:13 -0400; Jim, Yes, i seen the high efficiency buck boost HV converters increasing the IF Noise floor in Microwave Receiver's by spewing RF Hash into the MHz region. Good design & Filtering fixed this ! Not go; /archives//html/RFI/2017-03/msg00065.html (8,012 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] when to apply mitigation techniques to solar array RFI (score: 1): Author: Chuck Gooden <Chuck.Gooden@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:09:12 -0500; I am sorry but there are no BUTS here. Jim Brown is 100% correct in his statement. Fixing issues out in the field requires considerable resources spent in personnel, travel expenses, and labor to fix; /archives//html/RFI/2017-03/msg00068.html (11,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]