Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Behringer\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Behringer\s+RFI\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:24:44 -0700; They were pretty egregious in their behavior. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00029.html (8,737 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:46:18 -0700; (Snip).. Hmmmmm..... I just stumbled across Behringer recently on the web... they have a good looking web site, and a really good looking product line whose exremely low prices seemed too good to be; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00030.html (7,582 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:32:08 -0400; The site just links to paint products. I'm not sure what this has to do with towers or HF antennas. John KK9A Hmmmmm..... I just stumbled across Behringer recently on the web... they have a good look; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00031.html (7,340 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:44:32 -0400; There's a typo in the URL below, the correct site is http://www.behringer.com/ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list T; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00032.html (7,982 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:00:27 -0000; I'm sorry to hear this about Behringer as I've successfully used their mixers in my shack. I have Mackie's in my home recording studio, but the Behrigner's seemed perfect (high quality/low cost) for; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00033.html (9,610 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:15:25 -0700; I suspect that the FCC will be watching them pretty closely in the future. Reading between the lines of the decision, it looks like the were pretty cranky that they could only go back a year for the; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00036.html (9,542 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Behringer RFI (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:24:49 -0700; Behringer is NOT in any way high quality, but it is low cost. Mackie and Aphex are two companies who took successful legal action against Behringer, but they are FAR from the only companies whose pro; /archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00037.html (8,092 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]