Mail Archive Search: <+from:G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF & DK3VN (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:54:04 +0000; Bill Turner wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:24:10 +0100, Waldemar DK3VN wrote: But, why we need a rule, which is a burden for S&P-OP's, like me? ________________________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00334.html (8,016 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Region III Band Plan (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:51:21 +0000; Bill Turner wrote: On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:40:29 +0000, Bob Stewart wrote: Seems to me that the Region I and II QRP CW ops should re-think their choice frequency. I understand that these "QRP CW" freq; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00370.html (9,285 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 3B9C RTTY - 0326z 29 March 2004 (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:25:54 +0100; Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: Just saw my first 3B9C spot on RTTY. 29 March 2004 at 0326z 21085.2 listening up, spotted by JM7TKK Three more operators are arriving today, and at least two are experienced R; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00412.html (7,338 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] fluttered signals (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 07:37:09 +0100; Bill Turner wrote: On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 20:34:18 -0000, Jacques RAMBAUD wrote: -Is there any other way , or RTTY decoder that are better in this respect , how old TU with discrete filters (88mh) works; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00181.html (8,704 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:38:29 +0100; N6OJ wrote: I am among the happy users of MMTTY but was wondering if some of you that have been seriously comparing decoders would share your settings of MMTTY as there are a multitude of them some b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00202.html (7,560 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RE: odd signals + recordings (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:59:03 +0100; Phil Cooper wrote: Are you really likely to start playing with various settings during a CQ session in a contest? Not a chance. You have to set it up before the contest, the best way you know how, an; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00229.html (7,332 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 17:25:21 +0100; Peter Laws wrote: Is it because I don't use fancy QSL label software More likely the reason is that *they* use a computerized system, that is set up to produce one card per station, and they simply d; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00084.html (8,275 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] using santa cruz turtle beach as second sound card (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:53:37 +0100; Mark wrote: It looks like the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz sound card really doesn't like to operate with a second sound card. It's running under WIN98SE and the second card is based on Crystal CS4281. If; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00108.html (9,510 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Yaesu FT-920 setup - HELP!! (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:25:01 +0100; Mike wrote: Kyle, 1. First, be sure that you are, in fact, supplying the FS keying information to the 920 before suspecting the rig. If you have an ohm meter, put it across the leads that you are con; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00076.html (8,988 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Yaesu FT-920 setup - HELP!! (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:08:43 +0100; Chen wrote: Maybe W7AY would care to comment? Hah, you'd read my mind, John. I had just 10 minutes ago sent Kyle a private email suggesting that he monitor the rig while grounding and ungrounding the; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00102.html (10,691 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Yaesu FT-920 setup - HELP!! (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:46:41 +0100; John Fleming wrote: To repeat a previous message, I've had no problems with two - no, make that three - different types of regular non-Darlington opto-isolators keying the PTT, CW and FSK inputs of a; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00108.html (10,356 bytes)
12. Re: Rig Interfacing (was: [RTTY] Yaesu FT-920 setup - HELP!!) (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:20:20 +0100; George Wrote: I think I will "volunteer" to write up a more complete summary and picture of what might be happening. Good idea! Ian is somewhat on the right track. The devil in the "details" is that; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00123.html (11,943 bytes)
13. [RTTY] NAQP from Europe (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:52:00 +0100; Well, that was interesting, to spend a short time trying to give a few points away. This is one of those contests where it's nice to have a short name, and all my own too :-) Signals on 20 were weak; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00206.html (7,597 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:41:35 +0100; Kok Chen wrote: If the weakest detectable audio signal from the rig (post AGC) is at least 5% of the max audio from the rig (i.e., 26 dB range or a loss of 4 bits full scale for the weak signal), I d; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00224.html (9,675 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] FT1000MP is FSK. (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:31:57 +0100; Kok Chen wrote: My mistake for saying the FT1000MP is not direct FSK -- it is. Thanks to Ian, G3SEK for pointing it out to me. I just got back to the home QTH so I could check the schematics. The FSK; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00331.html (9,055 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Award (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:18:26 +0100; N6OJ wrote: Just a note to say thanks to all the gang at CQ magazine for the First place W6 Certificate. for WW RTTY WPX Keep up the good work Thanks also for the certificate for GX5RP - 1st SO40HP E; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00062.html (6,861 bytes)
17. Re: external DSP audio filters (was Re: [RTTY] AA5AU ContestNotes forCQWW RTTY now on-line) (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:54:44 +0100; Jerry Pixton wrote: Since the JPS NIR-12 filters were not available, last spring I opted for the MFJ 784B Audio DSP filters which I put in series from my radios, FT1000mp and IC756proII, to the sound; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00024.html (9,264 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] santa cruz (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:44:04 +0100; Brian wrote: Hi All, Thanks Jeff for the info,I have done most of the obvious things, changing PCI slots etc. Myself and another ham shipped 2 cards in from the states, his loaded up OK and he is rav; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00121.html (7,303 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Article on LCD Displays (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:57:24 +0000; Phil Florig wrote: Just got the latest issue of "Desktop Engineering" and a nice article on LCDs. Tended toward the higher end market but the content and market outlook is for LCDs in general. Most C; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00079.html (8,881 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Greyline site (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:28:17 +0000; W7WHY wrote: Hi All Here's a neat site I found. http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Pacific/d/-8/java It gives your local time plus a little greyline map underneath. Kinda neat. But it only shows the US; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00117.html (7,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]