Mail Archive Search: <+from:W4TV@subich.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:W4TV@subich.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:53:20 -0400; Sure, Bill. You might as well say, "I don't have anything against blacks or Jews, I just don't want THEM in MY neighborhood." As Mike pointed out, this is the unlimited SO category - the premiere ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00135.html (8,842 bytes)
102. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:24:55 -0400; And this proves what? If an operator improves his CW technique by learning to copy at 30 WPM instead of 8 WPM, his score will go up by 40% (or more). You are trying to create separate entry classes; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00139.html (10,568 bytes)
103. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:40:54 -0400; Bill, you have apparently looked in to the mirror. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00149.html (10,320 bytes)
104. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:01:38 -0400; Single operator is the most popular category in every contest in terms of entries and in terms of participants (even if one counts all of the operators at the multi-op stations). That makes it the pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00150.html (9,218 bytes)
105. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:01:38 -0400; "traditional transceiver operation" is a relatively new concept and has no bearing on this topic. Separate transmitter/receiver operation - including the ability to support duplex operation - was th; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00151.html (12,192 bytes)
106. Re: [RTTY] Fw: SO1R Proclamation (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:05:47 -0400; Total poppycock! Demonstratively not true. Many SO1R competitions already have a back-up or mobile radio that can be put into service. Basic LPT controlled SO2R controllers can be assembled for less; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00167.html (11,571 bytes)
107. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:09:14 -0400; Speak for yourself. All of my comments have been in regard to SO2R as an operating technique totally independent of the mode of emission. That should have been abundantly clear by the comparison of; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00176.html (9,992 bytes)
108. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:01:36 -0400; Tom, You can't make that argument - period. All else is NEVER equal. Alternatively: when all else is equal take two identical, extremely competent expertly skilled CW operators with identical CW stat; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00184.html (19,561 bytes)
109. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:53:53 -0400; Paul, The SO2R operator is just like every other entrant in the Single Operator entry class - he is limited by the same six band changes per clock hour rule. The "six band changes per hour" rule only; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00188.html (23,904 bytes)
110. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:25:31 -0400; You weren't paying attention to the demands that SO2R be made a separate category (whether it be a separate category for SO2R or a category for "SO1R ONLY" the effect is the same). Not hardly - that; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00191.html (9,335 bytes)
111. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:25:31 -0400; Since I'm more interested in multipliers than QSOs, why should I bother to submit a log if by chasing multipliers, I have exceeded a band change limit? However, on a larger scale, why would an AA5AU; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00192.html (29,614 bytes)
112. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:39:35 -0400; No, I'm not an 'every contest' participant. However, you appear to be more than willing to make personal attacks and bend facts to suit your own misanthropic view of the world. Since I have only hel; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00226.html (9,597 bytes)
113. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:21:20 -0400; Bill, This is complete bullshit and below even someone like you. I have been a vocal opponent of discrimination against SO2R (and user of SO2R techniques - although not an accomplished user) long bef; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00234.html (11,086 bytes)
114. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:10:35 -0400; Bill, You cannot be trusted to speak the truth when it does not suit you. I have no need to make any disclaimer. Yes, I distribute microHAM products. However, there are far more single radio products; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00255.html (11,780 bytes)
115. Re: [RTTY] w4atv/w6irt (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:41:49 -0400; Bill, I'm tired of your crap ... it is not a "statement of facts." You are making up facts to suit yourself and it is uncalled for. I sell far more single radio products that "SO2R" products. A chang; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00256.html (11,805 bytes)
116. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:41:36 -0400; That's the whole point ... you have decided that you no longer want to improve you skills to handle the demands of competitive single operator contesting and you want those who have done so kept out; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00267.html (10,793 bytes)
117. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R - the main issue (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:14:29 -0400; Denny, I think we can all agree that SO2T - the guy who transmits on two bands at the same time (e.g., calls CQ on one band to hold a frequency while working someone on another band) is breaking the; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00289.html (9,637 bytes)
118. Re: [RTTY] A technical question (DigiKeyer) (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:40:46 -0400; Jacek, I'm sorry to hear about the problem with your FT-1000MP. It is highly unlikely that the failure is related to the microHAM DigiKeyer. The audio section (USB) of DigiKeyer is transformer isolat; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00356.html (11,533 bytes)
119. Re: [RTTY] A technical question (DigiKeyer) (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:25:22 -0400; No, it should not make any difference or create a problem. The reference to powering from the radio was to indicate that the radio's aux output was fused and would have protected the radio in the ev; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00362.html (9,757 bytes)
120. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY and USB/COM port problem (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:04:28 -0400; Barry, There are a lot of USB to Serial adapters that do not support 5 bit codes or data rates less than 300 bps. With those adapters, you will need to use EXTFSK (even with FSK on TxD). Using a gene; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00042.html (9,160 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]