Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4TV@subich.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] RTTY contest software (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:55:05 -0400
Bill, After assembling/refurbishing a salvage Mac to use for testing microHAM interfaces with Mac applications, Chen and Don Agro both told me the minimum realistic system is a 500 MHZ G4 (find a G5
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00351.html (9,369 bytes)

82. Re: [RTTY] Interface Question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:56:12 -0500
Although this is the RTTY reflector ... note that only microKEYER will do voice modes (DVK with WriteLog, N1MM, Win-Test, SD, etc.). All of the other units mentioned connect to the rear panel inputs
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00022.html (8,511 bytes)

83. Re: [RTTY] WRITELOG USB INTERFACE PROBLEM (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:05:09 -0500
WriteLog does not permit use of EXTFSK in the MMTTY plug-in. You will note there is no way to select EXTFSK as the "PTT Port" in the MMTTY plug in and no option to select EXTFSK in RTTYrite as the F
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00033.html (11,545 bytes)

84. [RTTY] The hits just keep on coming! (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:37:10 -0500
Also today, the FCC also adopted an Order on Reconsideration, in WT Docket 04-140 -- the "omnibus" proceeding -- agreeing to modify the Amateur Radio rules in response to an ARRL request to accommod
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00081.html (7,095 bytes)

85. Re: [RTTY] TS-2000 ACC Audio Connections (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:04:11 -0500
Don, All of microHAM's interfaces use the DIN 13 for RTTY (AFSK/PSK) fixed level in/out, PTT and FSK. The DIN 13 is a weak link but if the connector is assembled carefully and the strain relief is as
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00038.html (7,952 bytes)

86. Re: [RTTY] need some help (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:40:51 -0500
In fact, most radios except Icom assume that Mark is "FSK Input Open" (or FSK Input High) which is consistent with the logic state "1." However, since most terminal units and FSK interfaces use a tra
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00123.html (12,326 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:27:03 -0500
That is not a matter of power level but of improperly setting the audio drive to the transmitter. A high power signal cal be just as clean as a QRP signal if the operator takes precautions not to ov
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00237.html (11,238 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] Rtty contest when Cw contest is on also (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:36:39 -0400
The same thing can be said about CW and phone contests ... there is always something out there from the East Podunk Sprint to the Empty State QSO Party. You can thank the ARRL for not promoting RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00096.html (11,131 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] The Email Robots are coming to RTTY! (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:36:19 -0400
I was a member of the original ARRL "ad hoc digital committee" in the 1980's that provided the recommendations on which the current "semi-automatic" rules are based. The "semi-automatic" language was
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00194.html (8,732 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] 80m RTTY freqs. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:00:27 -0400
Ed, The rules are quite clear - "80 meters" is now 3.500 - 3.600 and "75 meters" is now 3.600 - 4.000. RTTY (digital) is only permitted on "80 meters" and phone/image are only permitted on "75 meters
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00260.html (8,107 bytes)

91. Re: [RTTY] More on Cushcraft balun (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:55:57 -0400
The only concern I would have is if you are shunt feeding the tower with that antenna. All elements on the X7 appear to be insulated. This makes the only connection to any elements through the balun
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00280.html (7,755 bytes)

92. Re: [RTTY] Extra Comports board (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:25:43 -0400
Peter, For four ports try: www.byterunner.com/byterunner/product_name=PL-4COM www.byterunner.com/byterunner/product_name=USB-4COM-120V If it's eight ports that floats you boat, try this: www.byterunn
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-05/msg00010.html (7,300 bytes)

93. Re: [RTTY] getting started (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:19:37 -0400
Tad, If you are going to do FSK with the microKEYER, you will need to use the MMTTY plug-in with WriteLog. There is a timing issue between Writelog's FSK and the virtual port software library used to
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-06/msg00014.html (9,216 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] MTTY and a Linear (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:35:16 -0400
For WinWarbler/DXLab Suite users ... the lead/delay parameter is on the CW tab but it applies to all modes. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-06/msg00053.html (7,626 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] WF1B on a FFFAAASSSTTT computer ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:40:29 -0400
Of course the SC3R guys will attempt to accomplish by intimidation that which they can only justify on an emotional basis. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00050.html (9,101 bytes)

96. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:47:12 -0400
Not again ... SO2R is simply one more tool to maximize a score. To paraphrase: I'm willing to bet that those who have (monoband, stacks, etc.) yagi antennas are judging their relative success by com
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00115.html (10,500 bytes)

97. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:57:12 -0400
When sponsors start enforcing separate categories for antennas with more than one half wavelength in any dimension and antenna supports taller than 50 feet, it will be time to consider a separate ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00116.html (10,124 bytes)

98. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:17:52 -0400
Jay, Putting aside all the other stuff ... Anyone running N1MM, Writelog, Win-Test, CTWin, etc. also have SO2R features available to them. Just as some phone operators choose not to make the wave fil
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00119.html (17,478 bytes)

99. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:38:33 -0400
Time is time ... how the operator chooses to use it is a matter of skill and strategy. The keyer, computer logging, higher antennas, bigger power all provide more time in one way or another. Put ano
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00122.html (11,359 bytes)

100. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:53:20 -0400
Bill - you just don't "get it." This isn't an "appropriate category" issue - separate but equal was struck down more than 50 years ago. For both the SO1R and SO2R operator, if they are playing by th
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00134.html (12,618 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu