Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:37:35 -0400
30 hours. You can only operate 24 hours. SS has some unique rules. You work stations once, which tends to make it harder even for big guns to just sit an call CQ all weekend. There are a limited numb
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00218.html (8,904 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:27:40 -0400
NAQP and SS are very different. NAQP is much shorter, and has a multiplier-passing strategy. SS is more rate-oriented, with a limited number of multipliers and a rule that says you work stations once
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00221.html (8,078 bytes)

23. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY AA4LR SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:47:29 -0400
CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: SOAB HP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 8 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 0 0 0 0 40: 45 82 31 8 20:
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00228.html (9,710 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Wow! check out this USB to Serial adapter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:02:55 -0400
Interesting. The first link claims support for "Apple OS-8, OS-9, OS- X". It's been called MacOS for over a decade now.... The second link has Windows and Linux drivers featured, but if you click on
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00088.html (8,439 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] CW Op Complaints (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:29:00 -0500
The problem is that there's a few 40m CW operators who can't seem to get a clue that 40m isn't 300 kHz worldwide, and that RTTY and other digital modes belong around 7035-7045 kHz. Every time they he
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00072.html (7,799 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] RTTY In CW Bands ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:35:55 -0500
SHEER LUNACY!!! After all, this is the WAE RTTY contest. WAE stands for Worked All Europe. 7037.5 kHz is dead in the middle of the Region 1 bandplan. I just got finished tuning 40m. Here in GA, there
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00080.html (7,624 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:03:29 -0500
The goal of any contest is to encourage participation. What's unclear about the rules? The categories are extremely similar to ARRL SS (at least, SS of a few years ago) There is no need for an SO2R c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00146.html (9,599 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:55:17 -0500
If you look at the RTTY RU rules, there's a link that indicates the general rules and the rules for HF contests. If you look at the HF rules, you'll find this: "2.1.2.Single-Operator stations are all
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00159.html (10,378 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:54:47 -0500
You keep saying this, but it isn't borne out as a fact. Not at all. There are many fine ops who produce world-class scores using only one radio. K3ZO is a good example. 10 years ago, I had the experi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00191.html (10,157 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:02:29 -0500
Because it is ONE operator. The key element, the centerpiece and the weak link in the chain is the operator. (Just try to write a rule to separate these hypothetical "classes". How do you define 2R?
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00192.html (10,462 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:14:00 -0500
The rule you are looking for is here: http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-hf.html These are the general rules for ARRL HF contests. The specific rule is: "2.1.2.Single-Operator stations
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00216.html (10,975 bytes)

32. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup AA4LR Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:13:39 -0500
ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: Single Op HP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 4.0 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 0 40: 137 20: 99 15: 0 10: 0 -- Total: 236 State/Prov =
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00185.html (8,195 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Cluster reports (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:06:07 -0500
You can also go to DX Summit and do a query. I did mine for my four-hour operation in the RU, and found one spot: N4NW 21086.9 AA4LR 0322 08 Jan 2006 Curious thing. I did not operate on 15m at all. H
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00280.html (8,402 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] CQ vs. S&P for RTTY Round-UP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:34:31 -0500
These are deep contest mysteries. A lot of times, it is in your gut, sometimes, you count off. I'm no expert, but I'll try to answer these. Note my contest experience is mostly Phone and CW, I've jus
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00281.html (10,381 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:20:02 -0500
Indeed. Oh, yeah. Oh, no. That's how it should be. And perhaps should be on every band, like every other country in the entire world. About doggone time. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00296.html (8,292 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:44:37 -0500
I never liked this practice in CW. Seems I would always copy the CQ and miss the guy's call. I also don't like the "CQ NA AA4LR NA" for the same reason. Space? Why not a CR/LF? I had a couple of guys
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00298.html (8,738 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] RTTY should stay above 025 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:01:00 -0500
Yeah, just like we do with SSB on 40m.... <grin> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00300.html (7,134 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:29:05 -0500
He means the protocol is freely available, and complete enough to actually work. If you have to pay, that isn't free. Not software, but specifications. I thought that particular statement was abundan
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00304.html (8,802 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:01:44 -0500
Joe, you certainly are entitled to your opinion, and I respect that. Indeed, several hams I respect greatly have similar opinions. I just have a few observations of my own: Yes, but these were largel
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00307.html (11,046 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:03:08 -0500
What part of the proposed regulation states this? I looked for it and couldn't find it. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00308.html (8,597 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu