Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa6yq@ambersoft.com: 201 ]

Total 201 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:31:49 -0500
The ARRL has steadfastly ignored the problem of automatic stations without busy frequency detectors, which blindly transmit over QSOs already in progress. Allowing automatic stations to employ even w
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00278.html (14,169 bytes)

162. [RTTY] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 15:33:14 -0500
The ARRL has filed a petition with the FCC to replace the current symbol rate limits with a bandwidth limit. If accepted, digital modes as wide as 2800 hertz would become legal for use by US hams on
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00033.html (9,052 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 03:32:55 -0500
I agree that the 300 baud symbol rate limitation should be raised, Steve, but this should be accomplished without making the interference from automatic stations situation worse as the ARRLs petition
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00041.html (9,822 bytes)

164. Re: [RTTY] [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:56:33 -0500
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Muething Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2013 9:31 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; rtty@contesting.com; DX-
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00044.html (18,842 bytes)

165. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Comment Pointers? (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:35:05 -0500
See <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520962909> 73, Dave, AA6YQ Can anyone give me some pointers as to what to say to to affectively oppose the ARRL RM-11708 on the FCC ECFS site? Any guid
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00126.html (7,364 bytes)

166. Re: [RTTY] RM 11708 Comments (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:26:21 -0500
The FCC doesn't view the comment process as a poll; if they did, they'd just use SurveyMonkey and count the responses. Comments of the form "I love it" or "I hate it" likely have little impact. Comme
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00130.html (7,593 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RM-11708 Letter and response (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:08:57 -0500
If "one of the principal objectives of the ARRL petition is to establish a limit where none presently exists", that objective could have been expeditiously accomplished by simply proposing a bandwidt
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00174.html (12,864 bytes)

168. Re: [RTTY] Wow - thanks Dr Flowers! (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:42:50 -0500
Hi Al, Baud rate does NOT limit BW, except for 2-tone FSK RTTY. Actually, two tone FSK RTTY is the ONLY digital modulation that currently has a defacto BW limit under FCC rules. Those limits are 300
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00195.html (10,576 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] XP Support going QRT (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:34:05 -0500
I am running the 32-bit version of Windows 7 Professional (SP1) on a Dell XPS 400 with a Pentium D at 2.8 GHz and 2G of RAM. It has no trouble simultaneously running DXLab along with Chrome and sever
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00120.html (9,505 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:02:10 -0500
I particularly liked this part: "The counterproposals contained in some opposing comments of a 1 kilohertz or a 2.2 kilohertz limit are intended to preclude most data emissions at MF and HF. They are
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00143.html (9,503 bytes)

171. Re: [RTTY] Frequency accuracy of WZ7I skimmer (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:50:31 -0500
Thanks, Bob. WinWarbler, the digital mode component of the freeware DXLab Suite, includes both the MMTTY and 2-Tone engines. When working RTTY, you can configure them both to demodulate the same sign
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00243.html (13,191 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] Icom CI-V with Transistors (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:19:50 -0500
I have used and recommended this circuit for many years; it works well: <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/interface.jpg> 73, Dave, AA6YQ Has anyone used the "transistor type" of serial to TTL (CI-
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00286.html (7,523 bytes)

173. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:40:18 -0500
It's easy to hide a problem by spending $$$ to move it to faster hardware. To date nothing significant has been done to resolve what the LotW Advisory Committee calls LotW's "substantial technical de
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00190.html (10,923 bytes)

174. Re: [RTTY] Get selective DX-Spots by Email (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:15:12 -0500
Walter has done a fantastic job. Now all that remains is: 1. Once a spot is received from MyDXspot, it should automatically be decoded and the rig set to the precise spotting frequency. 2. The call
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00224.html (8,922 bytes)

175. Re: [RTTY] List of Winlink stations (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:35:27 -0400
Then what was the purpose of the sub band from the get go? the years. Each time, I have posted the FCC's rationale that accompanied 97.221. It effectively says "so that hams can develop techniques t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00137.html (9,493 bytes)

176. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:28:40 -0400
Auto sub band was created to reduce QRM from the PACTOR ect mode so called robots. The only problem was that others would wonder and then complain when QRM'ed. To bad that all "will" not use that su
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00173.html (10,292 bytes)

177. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:15:14 -0400
But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have been in their own sub band. granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies. Unattended stations are expect
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00216.html (9,103 bytes)

178. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:44:56 -0400
Your exact words were "But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have been in their own sub band." The phrase "in their own sub band" could certainly be construed as a sub
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00218.html (9,750 bytes)

179. Re: [RTTY] QST article about Win XP (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:23:53 -0400
The author of that article, WA9PIE, is an owner of Ham Radio Deluxe; he works for J.C. Penney, and can be contacted via Mike (at) wa9pie.net 73, Dave, AA6YQ Not exactly directly related to RTTY but s
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00234.html (10,690 bytes)

180. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:40:58 -0400
Re " The busy frequency detectors deployed by unattended digital stations are not effective." What leads you to this conclusion? 73, Dave, AA6YQ Here are some general thoughts and concerns that can b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00316.html (13,307 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu