Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ad0k@inbody.net: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [RTTY] Email TA2ZF? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:49:59 -0600
His QSL manager is UT2UB ANDRE LYAKIN P.O.Box 99 KIEV-10 01010 UKRAINE Ut2ub@ham.kiev.ua Is this different from what you had? Don/AD0K Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL --Original Message-- From:
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00239.html (7,732 bytes)

2. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:05:12 -0600
Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL I am new to this RTTY business, so still learning. Where can I find out if they got my NA RTTY Sprint log? Don/AD0K QSL via eQSL and LotW _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00277.html (6,774 bytes)

3. RE: [RTTY] Noise with MMTTY... (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:09:44 -0600
I use WinWarbler, but it uses MMTTY as the engine. I always see some noise, even when the computer is not connected to anything. The noise shows up both on the x/y scope and on the spectrum display r
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00297.html (10,172 bytes)

4. RE: [RTTY] R1FJL ON RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:24:23 -0600
40 meters appears to be open between US and Europe, but no RTTY signals. I am working a few US stations around 7.084. I hear European CW stations no problem. Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL ___
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00310.html (7,163 bytes)

5. RE: [RTTY] R1FJL ON RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:36:19 -0600
Which DX spotting site do you use for RTTY DX spots? Don Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL Yes worked him at 0225 Z 599 on 14083.8 for a new one on rtty and he was calling cq cq cq !!!!!! 73s Fre
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00312.html (8,823 bytes)

6. RE: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:19:23 -0600
My background both as a former professional musician and as a naval officer with years of experience in hunting submarines by passive sonar (both aurally and by waterfall display), what appears to be
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00332.html (11,384 bytes)

7. RE: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:59:18 -0600
I am going to run "split", with xmit on the LSB side (for AFSK) and CW narrow on the rcv side. This does not work well for contesting, as I have to manually match the two VFOs, but will work for casu
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00339.html (9,349 bytes)

8. RE: MMTTY AFC, O-scope (Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:58:09 -0600
In the Navy, when we used RTTY extensively, it was 850Hz shift, 100 baud. Of course, we also had the signal encrypted, so that required constant "diddling" to ensure the crypto remained synchronized.
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00368.html (10,350 bytes)

9. RE: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:19:04 -0600
I was just reviewing my contest log from the NA RTTY Sprint, and noticed that, to date, the electronic QSL rate of contesters (LotW) has been 30%. My normal LotW QSL rate is 8% overall and 20% since
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00380.html (7,211 bytes)

10. RE: [RTTY] R1FJ Now ON RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:20:34 -0600
I heard him on 20M RTTY last night at my QTH just south of Austin, TX, but because of antenna issues here was unable to reach him. Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL Darn, and I was looking for th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00381.html (7,559 bytes)

11. RE: [RTTY] QSLS (was:Spring Break RTTY Sprint) (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:47:03 -0600
Could not agree more. I eQSL and LotW 100%, I QSL 100% all DX, and QSL anyone stateside who desires one. I like doing them all. I am sorry some folks don't like the eQSLs...I think they see them as s
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00390.html (11,188 bytes)

12. [RTTY] 80M Open 3.5835 (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:39:14 -0600
I can hear all sorts of DX on 80M CW (3B9C), but no RTTY. Is there anyone out there who can load up on 80M. I will call CQ on 3.5835 Don Don Inbody/AD0K QSL via LotW and eQSL ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00408.html (6,195 bytes)

13. RE: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:40:36 -0500
I can understand why someone might not want to QSL all contest contacts by QSL cards, paying postage on each, but with the advent of eQSL and LotW, it is nearly effortless and I find it useful to con
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00044.html (8,643 bytes)

14. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:51:49 -0500
W1AW/90 has not loaded any data into LotW. I checked a couple of minutes ago. The last time W1AW loaded anything into LotW was Mar 16. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00096.html (8,397 bytes)

15. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:21:48 -0500
Are they QSLing as W1AW or W1AW/90. I can't see that they have uploaded any /90 info on LOTW. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL Steve, Thanks for the response. You were
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00102.html (9,520 bytes)

16. [RTTY] Up RTTY 40M 7083.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:12:23 -0500
Anyone up for a QSO? 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00132.html (6,246 bytes)

17. RE: [RTTY] T33C 14081.1 qsx up @ 0229UTC LOUD!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:58:47 -0500
I could hear everyone calling him, but could never find him from down here in Texas. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00165.html (7,744 bytes)

18. RE: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:47:06 -0500
Anyone up for 20M RTTY QSO. 14.0845 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL Hi, let me add some comments about RTTY copy with the PTC-II. Walter, DL4RCK and myself bugged the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00208.html (11,290 bytes)

19. [RTTY] 30M RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:41:09 -0500
Okay, had all the fun I could have on 20M. Anyone up for 30M RTTY. 10133.5 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00210.html (8,416 bytes)

20. [RTTY] 30M RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:09:30 -0500
Okay, I am on 10.1435 calling. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00211.html (6,240 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu