Mail Archive Search: <+from:akozak@hourglass.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:akozak@hourglass.com: 188 ]

Total 188 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] After the Contest, AMP REPAIRS?? Interface Choices?? (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:58:53 -0500; 2) I still prefer my HAL 3K's but I'm entertaining choices for interfaces... Rigblaster Pro vs US Interface/Navigator vs the MicroHAM. Anybody with thoughts pro/con between them?? Rigblaster - these; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00178.html (8,250 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] After the Contest, AMP REPAIRS?? Interface Choices?? (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:03:12 -0500; Joe, Chill. Last I checked, Czechoslovakia was a former Soviet client state, though you are correct that it was not one of THE socialist republics. The half life of computer technology is frightenly; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00194.html (11,676 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Have others noticed this (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:20:56 -0500; I only spent a couple of hours S&Ping this year. I run FSK. I found some W6 dude on 40m who must have been using AFSK and didn't know what the RIT is for. He responded to my call by telling me I was; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00196.html (10,794 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:26:22 -0500; I think QRZ has morphed from the original use of "Who is calling me" to a general purpose "Who else is there". QRZ? refers to the former use, while plain old QRZ refers to the latter. With voice, it'; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00198.html (8,630 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Spotting question (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:02:35 -0500; Don't know if it's a related problem, but when I first started using RTTY it was with AFSK. I would setup MMTTY so that the mark/space tones were within a reasonable place in the receiver passband, w; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00262.html (10,834 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] software (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:36:14 -0500; It helps being an IT professional and having majored in EE in college, but my first experience with RTTY involved waking up at my normal early hour (10:30 AM or later) on a RU Saturday a few years ba; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00405.html (8,480 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] N6PE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:14:07 -0500; I don't know how many programmers are in here that would get the reference, but I think an Obfuscated RTTY contest could be a winner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscated_code http://en.wikipedia.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00629.html (8,135 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [GreenKeys] lack of civility (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:12:47 -0500; During one of my S&P sessions, I happened across a KP4 who was just doing "normal" RTTY, i.e., not in the contest. In haste I answered his CQ and was embarassed that I was not equipped for a typical; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00098.html (13,563 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:02:45 -0500; Yes, but a extra space (or CR) adds almost 22 ms to an exchange and, well, those add up, don't they? Wasn't there a thread discussing that here just recently? ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^); /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00103.html (8,842 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:29:58 -0500; Apparently the string of wink emoticons was lost on you. Sheesh.... ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: First of all, it's not 22 mS, it's 167 mS, same as any other character, and second it's not an EXTRA space; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00132.html (9,702 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:37:15 -0500; It's not controversial. It's the obsession that accompanies part of the conversation that some of us (well, me anyway) find amusing. A number of stations that called me over the weekend when I was ru; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00140.html (10,729 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:58:02 -0500; I don't know for sure why, but I observe it dozens of times in any contest. I suspect the interface design. A character is probably still in the serial interface buffer but the software thinks it's d; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00148.html (9,909 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] WPX from GU0SUP (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:51:56 -0500; I had already worked S9DX on a couple of bands, though not RTTY. I ran across them during my last 20m S&P pass on Sunday afternoon and got through on the second call. One the perverse benefits of con; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00154.html (12,437 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WPX N5UWY SOAB(TS) LP (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:27:11 -0500; (a) Tribander/Single Element (TB-WIRES): During the contest an entrant shall use only one (1) tribander (any type, with a single feed line from the transmitter to the antenna) for 10, 15, and 20 mete; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00157.html (9,537 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:15:19 -0500; --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of WS7I Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:26 PM To: Peter Laws Cc: RTTY contest group Subject: Re; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00181.html (10,183 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] UR 599 QWI QWI (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:31:57 -0500; Assuming a FIGS character was dropped (though why it would have changed from FIGS to LTRS and then back tio FIGS after the 599 is unclear to me), this will help you see which number occupies the same; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00212.html (8,514 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:45:15 -0500; A couple of things: 1. PSK31 is 31.25 baud and RTTY (in ham applications) is 45.45 baud. RTTY is thus about 45% faster then PSK31. 2. I don't know how effective simple error detection would be in a R; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00245.html (12,611 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:11:02 -0500; Yeah, point taken. I was thinking pure symbol rate and not actual information. And given that the last model 15 or KSR33 departed the scene decades ago, why aren't we using ASCII, anyway? Al AB2ZY Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00249.html (11,949 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] RST/RPT Separator (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:59:26 -0500; Space is in both sets. Code 4. Al AB2ZY We've discussed this many times. A dash is better for RST+NR while a space is better for RST+QTH (or name or other non-numerical exchange) since dash is in the; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00257.html (8,359 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] WAZ progress? (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:56:58 -0400; I worked ST2AR on 15 in the WPX contest in February. Al AB2ZY I wonder how folks are doing on RTTY WAZ? Despite more than 59,000 RTTY Q's in the log, I have yet to work zone 34 (Libya, Egypt, Sudan); /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00156.html (7,927 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]