- 161. Re: [RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:19:48 +0000
- Absolutely. A very large percentage of Technicians are strictly VHF/UHF FM and maybe a handful are 10m phone operators. How many new ones are going to show up on that additional 50kHz when they are b
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00007.html (8,454 bytes)
- 162. Re: [RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 01:06:03 +0000
- Umm, yes, I am an idiot unable to read the legend on the ARRL band map. As Emily Litella would have said, "never mind". Al AB2ZY Absolutely. A very large percentage of Technicians are strictly VHF/UH
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00014.html (9,165 bytes)
- 163. Re: [RTTY] bandpass filters (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:25:31 +0000
- Since the highest power transceivers are 200 watts, why would you need filters rated for 1500? There is no technical reason I can think of why they can't go between the xcvr and amp. Al AB2ZY Bandpas
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00113.html (10,046 bytes)
- 164. Re: [RTTY] bandpass filters (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:01:21 +0000
- Well duh. Instead of drinking this coffee, I'll pour it on my crotch to wake up. Al AB2ZY To suppress harmonic content that is generated by the amps. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-char
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00115.html (10,813 bytes)
- 165. Re: [RTTY] Another lesson from Don (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:17:30 +0000
- Feh. I upgraded to N1MM+ late last year. The .mc files need to reside in the new directory tree under Program Files. I've been copying them over from the c:\N1MM folder as I need them. Since I am so
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00143.html (10,525 bytes)
- 166. [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 23:52:07 +0000
- Do a lot of you use the RBN or some other source of skimmer "spots"? I ask because I found during the BARTG that almost as soon as I started running a frequency I was handling a small pileup that wou
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00147.html (7,015 bytes)
- 167. Re: [RTTY] Another lesson from Don (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:31:16 +0000
- Oh definitely. You're supposed to record the time the other guy sent. Beyond the mechanics of how a specific time stamp gets "locked onto" a QSO before it is sent to you, there is no guarantee that y
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00156.html (9,210 bytes)
- 168. Re: [RTTY] Escape Key (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:40:59 +0000
- It's not directly possible. Keystrokes get sent to the window with focus. That's the way Windows works. Al AB2ZY Does anyone have this working without having to shift focus to the logging program bef
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00239.html (10,833 bytes)
- 169. Re: [RTTY] Trailing CQ (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:30:42 +0000
- IMO, RTTY operating practices don't need to change, the skimmer software paradigm does. In theoretical terms, the sampling interval needs to be longer. Instead of trying to deduce who is running from
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00258.html (14,491 bytes)
- 170. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:35:34 +0000
- Hearing them has been a nightmare from upstate NY with my little pistol antennas. I managed to work them on 30m CW using lots of attenuation and a K9AY loop that's obviously not a 30M receive antenna
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00019.html (11,698 bytes)
- 171. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:02:53 +0000
- I'm kind of inclined to agree. If you're going to pitch something (and I know this will upset some people), don't operate on 160M. Antennas are a problem for a portable operation; hearing is a proble
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00032.html (17,748 bytes)
- 172. Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Plus & Windows 10 (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:55:17 +0000
- The Rigblasters themselves are just interfaces, no driver is needed. I'm pretty sure the CD that comes with the product just has a collection of digital ham shareware, the documentation and the drive
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-05/msg00069.html (8,120 bytes)
- 173. Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Plus & Windows 10 (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 00:23:53 +0000
- Oh yeah, that's right. I had forgotten the reason. The Prolific drivers are fine but they don't support the knockoff chips. And the drivers that "work" with the knockoffs are usually crap. If you los
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-05/msg00073.html (8,829 bytes)
- 174. Re: [RTTY] Flex 6300 in low power RTTY contests; Maestro (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 01:59:33 +0000
- At least one of the online specs for the IC-756 Pro III (which I own) says RTTY is rated at 100 watts with 100% duty cycle. Probably representative of all the late model Icoms. There might be IMD or
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-06/msg00019.html (10,207 bytes)
- 175. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:20:16 +0000
- Did I miss something? What I read was: Tentatively, yes to drop symbol rate limitation. No to a blanket bandwidth limitation and leave in place "named emissions" or whatever the term is, that specify
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-07/msg00100.html (10,021 bytes)
- 176. Re: [RTTY] Question about RM-11708/Docket No. 16-239 NPRM (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:28:34 +0000
- I believe the RTTY variants are limited in bandwidth by stipulation of the maximum shift frequency outlined elsewhere in the regulations. I don't get that same warm fuzzy with respect to paragraph 4.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00037.html (9,795 bytes)
- 177. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:20:19 +0000
- Another area where technology has overtaken regulation. In an all analog world, it makes some sense to regulate transmissions based on content. In a digital world, it does not. There is no syntactic
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00079.html (11,218 bytes)
- 178. Re: [RTTY] If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:17:29 +0000
- You missed my point - maybe deliberately you pedant! You can argue by that reasoning that the entire Internet is analog as it is so at the physical layer. That layer is a means to an end. By regulati
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00085.html (14,902 bytes)
- 179. Re: [RTTY] Well darn... (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:36:33 +0000
- Only if the chips are counterfeit and not genuine Prolific. Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: RTTY <rtty-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00173.html (8,055 bytes)
- 180. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:30:55 +0000
- I think the way I would characterize it is as follows: radios In the long run and with a real world population, #1 usually is the lesser of the two evils. Al AB2ZY ___________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00309.html (9,656 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu