Mail Archive Search: <+from:akozak@hourglass.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:akozak@hourglass.com: 188 ]

Total 188 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] N1MM Question (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:45:05 -0400; Seems to be a lot of N1MM experts here, so..... Just started using N1MM with the BARTG contest. Bit of a learning curve both as far as getting it set up and using it. Is there a supported way to expo; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00238.html (7,468 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] N1MM Question (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:56:12 -0400; It is what it is - I didn't write it. It turns out that it does have the ability to do that, just not as part of the import process. On my list of programs to reevaluate. My recollection from a numb; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00263.html (8,212 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:10:32 -0400; Nothing as far as data transmission/reception is concerned. With ansynchronous communications. you need a clock at each end running at (in the case of 45.5 baud, close to) the same frequency. The le; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00299.html (8,843 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:04:44 -0400; The introduction of intercharacter delays would definitely change the throughput while not altering the timing a bit. Al AB2ZY In MMTTY, there is both a "Character wait" and "Diddle wait" which make; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00302.html (12,373 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] ST0R (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:52:59 -0400; Mirrors my experience as well. Over the last week and a half, I've probably got 2.5 hours from 2 QTH's into it with no joy yet. I'm trying not to get especially juiced about this one. The Sudan radio; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00293.html (9,080 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] cq ww rtty 2012 (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:40:25 -0400; Sept 29/30 according to http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/perpetualcal.php Hi I am looking ahead to 2012 and trying to figure out the Sept. weekend for CQ WW RTTY. Anybody know the dates? 73 Ken W; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00300.html (7,888 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] ST0R (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 00:26:22 -0400; You're right, of course, but then what's the point of spreading everyone out over 15 kHz if you're never going to listen over the whole range? Especially with RTTY, a bunch of operators chasing the D; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00304.html (12,215 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] ST0R (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:45:27 -0400; I'm not a fan or running by the numbers either if they spend 15 minutes on a single number. The guy on 17m was going from 0-9 in about 15 minutes. He made two passes for NA then shifted to SA. In my; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00005.html (14,660 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:42:14 -0400; Out of curiousity, what's the benefit to you of calling PSK31 RTTY? The only thing that's changed is the name of the award. It has been made representative of what the award is for. Handing out an RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00041.html (13,065 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] ST0R woes (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:52:16 -0400; The home QTH - which we're selling in a few months - is like the cobbler's shoeless children. A 500 watt amplifier, a ground mounted 2 band vertical, and a low hanging G5RV that was chosen only becau; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00044.html (8,426 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:56:01 -0400; To make the name of the award match what the award is for? Perhaps it was long past time to stop calling a tail a leg? The intention, as noted by ARRL board members, was to make the name of the awar; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00057.html (12,112 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:49:48 -0400; How did you setup N1MM? I had some spare time and hadn't completely scratched the contesting itch with my meager participation in SARTG. When I saw Don Hill's email I decided to jump in for a bit. An; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00260.html (11,821 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:54 -0400; That online tutorial is the nuts, isn't it? I got back into this hobby a few years ago after a 30+ year hiatus. One of the first operating activities I did after I got my ticket was November Sweepsta; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00274.html (10,539 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:07:09 -0400; 1. No modulation level setup to worry about. 2. With many radios, e.g. Icom, you don't get to use the superior RTTY receive filter without transmitting in FSK. Al AB2ZY Why is everybody hung up on FS; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00288.html (8,047 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:01:44 -0400; It's kind of a semantic definition today. I would define it as feeding the radio a pulse stream at the appropriate bit rate and letting the radio do all the work. How it does the work, assuming it do; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00313.html (10,492 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] Spotting frequency (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:55:21 -0400; I think the issue is that polling interval of the transceiver is longer than the time between the end of a transmission and logging/spotting a QSO. Especially if the logging program doesn't know or c; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00335.html (9,516 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] N5UWY BARTG Sprint 75 (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:01:55 -0400; YES! If he had called me when I was running, I'd probably have given up and deleted the busted QSO before submitting the log. I listened to 4-5 of his QSOs until I figured out what his call probably; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00046.html (7,176 bytes)
38. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY AB2ZYSOAB(A) HP (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:45:09 -0400; Long winded yarn follows. Delete now if easily bored. Goal this contest was to break the 1,000 QSO mark. The best I had ever done in a contest before was around 300. Contesting originally was a means; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00119.html (11,710 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:58:12 -0400; I don't know why RTTY is not allowed throughout the entire band. From a bandwidth standpoint, SSTV and RTTY are distinctions without a difference. Doesn't setting the carrier to a max of 3.597.7 with; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00090.html (8,428 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] JARTS Age Analysis (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:32:30 -0400; For the the type of question being asked, the median is usually a more meaningful metric - the point where half the sample is greater than and half is less than. Since human beings have an upper limi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00165.html (7,533 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]