- 81. Re: [RTTY] RTTY spectrum analysis article (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:30:08 -0500
- That was depressing. Transmit filters are only enabled on the Icom radios I have on SSB, so there is no apparent option for improvement that I can see for without switching to AFSK which, in turn, m
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00173.html (8,184 bytes)
- 82. Re: [RTTY] RTTY spectrum analysis article (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:44:39 -0500
- Then how do you keep strong signals in the passband of the (now wider) rig filter away from the AGC in the rig? Attenuating a strong signal now in the passband also attenuates the weak adjacent ones
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00175.html (9,437 bytes)
- 83. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Experts List (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:37:57 -0500
- I don't think that's it. The link is at the bottom of each contest page. It points here: http://www.bartg.org.uk/documents/contests/experts%20list/2012-Experts.pdf Al AB2ZY __________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00266.html (9,912 bytes)
- 84. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, more beat this to death (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:10:02 -0500
- I SHOULD know this. But. I. Don't. The space character is in both "character sets", i.e. LTRS and FIGS. It shouldn't be necessary to send a FIGS character after a space (or LTRS before) when sending
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00223.html (10,291 bytes)
- 85. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, more beat this to death (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:37:52 -0500
- I think the key concept I was missing is that it requires enabling by the sender. The way I was interpreting this thread was that UOS provided value even if the originator did not send extra shift ch
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00235.html (11,162 bytes)
- 86. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes for 2013 WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:13:01 -0500
- A minor nit, but N1MM used in "network mode" does not keep a single common log file, but a replicated copy. I do not know if N1MM uses native Access database replication or it's own messaging scheme,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00316.html (8,782 bytes)
- 87. [RTTY] NAQP Name (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:50:32 -0500
- Last year I got some good advice here regarding the use of my name - Al - in the exchange. It's the abbreviation of a state and apparently confuses some software (not N1MM, which I use, at least not
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00446.html (6,931 bytes)
- 88. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:23:53 -0400
- Not to put too fine a point on it, but he did say "take part in", not enter. I can't think of a contest that I've entered that did not allow SO1B operators to operate as much as they like on any band
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00083.html (9,409 bytes)
- 89. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:47:25 -0400
- You forgot the addition of the completely superfluous "Z"! Al AB2ZY Apparently they don't filter out all the lids. The rules say the GMT time is a "...full four figure GMT time..." So why are some li
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00100.html (9,637 bytes)
- 90. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:28:10 -0400
- All the signals from EU to my QTH in the NE USA all have a very pronounced flutter, which is very unusual for that area, except perhaps the very north of Scandinavia. Had a QSO this morning with a JA
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00109.html (14,122 bytes)
- 91. Re: [RTTY] 75 baud question (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:17:36 -0400
- The MMTTY engine takes care of everything. 75 baud RTTY is still 170Hz shift between mark and space. The only difference is the baud rate set for the UART. Al AB2ZY I would like to try 75 baud in the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-04/msg00063.html (8,507 bytes)
- 92. [RTTY] AB2ZY - BARTG Sprint 75 (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:04:48 -0400
- Two things: 1) Started the contest vowing to stay in the chair for the whole 4 hours. 20m was slow and after 30 minutes started looking elsewhere. 10m was dead. Went to 15m which was a bit more livel
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-04/msg00092.html (7,412 bytes)
- 93. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital: PSK vs RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:01:24 -0400
- I found the same thing. I had a few club members express interest in operating PSK on FD. We were class 5A. I set up one computer with my DigiKeyer interface to run both PSK and RTTY with a radio I l
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00007.html (9,976 bytes)
- 94. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:37:21 -0400
- Living proof of the misunderstanding! The rule is NO MORE THAN two blocks. Your interpretation after having stated the rule correctly is that a single 6 hour break is not consistent with the rule - i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00023.html (11,379 bytes)
- 95. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:42:43 -0400
- It's the same basic rule, just stated a different way. Nowhere does it say that you must take two blocks. Only that the sum of the two longest blocks must total 6 hours. One of those longest 2 blocks
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00030.html (13,241 bytes)
- 96. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:37:18 -0400
- You can operate longer.....just not in the contest! Seriously - 8 hours off in a 30 hour contest leaves only 22 possible hours to operate. You're allowed 24 operating hours - and the 6 off must be ac
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00032.html (14,823 bytes)
- 97. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 00:50:41 -0400
- 1+1=2 6+0=6 QED Al AB2ZY ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I thought we got rid of the New Math. One plus zero equals two? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00037.html (8,855 bytes)
- 98. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:41:37 -0400
- Nowhere does it say that you must take two breaks. Only that the off time will be calculated by summing the length of the longest two. If you take one break of 6 hours, the rule is satisfied and ther
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00043.html (11,193 bytes)
- 99. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:34:36 -0400
- 30 - (6 + 0) = 24 Here's the pseudo SQL ;^) SELECT OPTIME=(MAX(QSO_TIME) - MIN(QSO_TIME)) FROM QSOs WHERE CALL='K0RC' {build temporary table of off time blocks; left as an exercise for the student) S
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00047.html (13,209 bytes)
- 100. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:32:17 -0400
- Probably because: 1. IMO RU is supposed to be a "fun" contest (they're all fun, depending on your definition) that allows the more casual contester to be competitive with the "pros" without sleep dep
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00066.html (10,187 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu