Mail Archive Search: <+from:bill@k4fx.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:bill@k4fx.net: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Bill English" <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:37:53 -0400; CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: K4FX Operator(s): K4FX Station: K4FX Class: SOAB HP QTH: Hamlet NC Operating Time (hrs): 34.30 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 183 45 26 13 40: 2; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00211.html (6,881 bytes)
2. [RTTY] K4FX Makrothen Score (score: 1): Author: "Bill English" <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:03:35 -0400; Makrothen RTTY Contest Call: K4FX Operator(s): K4FX Station: K4FX Class: SO/Single Xcvr HP QTH: NC Operating Time (hrs): 15.95 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 50 40: 60 20: 296 15: 66 10: -- Total: 472 Tot; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00115.html (6,602 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] rtty w/ icom pro3 (score: 1): Author: bill@k4fx.net; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:28:55 -0500; Allan you are right, transmitting RTTY with the Pro III TX memories alone is tedious at best ,I think those memories would be better used as quick send memories in conjunction with MMTTY on a PC, co; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00119.html (9,311 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] B4 (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:21:02 -0400; Not being on both logs is not the case all of the time. In fact it is the case in a very small percentage of the time. I use QSO B4 because out of the many who called me again after working me during; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00026.html (10,785 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Removing line feed at end of contest messages (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:09:15 -0500; I found myself saying that about my callsign several times Don. It is almost eerie how you will copy that useless info on a weak signal and the exchange always drops into the mud...if they would send; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00096.html (13,425 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Removing line feed at end of contest messages (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:58:05 -0500; Never thought of that Rex. So it* is* good for something ;-) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00098.html (12,044 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Contest Behavior (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:50:51 -0500; That is one of my pet peeves, when people assume they have a band commanding signal. Then you don't get their report, you sent them a report and they send 73 GL and QSY. I have not logged many QSOs b; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00091.html (15,100 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Contest Behavior (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:24:49 -0500; Surely you don't log a QSO that you don't have a report for do you Bill? Read a little closer. I said I didn't get their report, and because of that, caused by arrogant behavior they are not logged.; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00097.html (10,573 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Contest Behavior (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:36:09 -0500; Speaking of contest protocols, I wish more people would end their CQ's with either CQ or TEST and please not use K. This is a good example of shorter not being better. I often tune by a station calli; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00098.html (11,646 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Contest Behavior (score: 1): Author: BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:33:48 -0500; Just forget it Bill, you obviously are lost on this conversion, this is a good example of why I rarely comment on these lists, you made the comment to ME about why would I not log a contact due to ar; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00108.html (10,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]