Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chen@mac.com: 990 ]

Total 990 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [RTTY] RE: JARTS Contest and operator age (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:41:28 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Phil Cooper wrote: Actually, the average isn't that meaningful anyway, and one should go by the MEAN age, which happened to be reasonably similar for most of us. Phil, d
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00274.html (8,037 bytes)

222. Re: [RTTY] "Sputnik Craze" (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:01:40 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:44 PM, sjolin wrote: I was born a few years earlier in 1947 and I remember Sputnik vividly as I was going to be an aerospace engineer. I was born in 1948 and also remembered the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00280.html (7,282 bytes)

223. Re: [RTTY] REAL TTY PICS and SOUNDS and MPGS (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:01:27 -0700
On Oct 23, 2004, at 5:43 AM, Shelby Summerville wrote: With all due respect, and my memories of "green keys, etc", aren't associated with RTTY, but our means of transmitting necessary data, between c
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00363.html (10,126 bytes)

224. [RTTY] Huh? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:15:01 -0700
I just worked a 8N1NSSAI/1 at 14090. I did a Google and it is not my imagination :-). Holloweeeeeennnnnnn. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00408.html (6,772 bytes)

225. Re: [RTTY] Huh? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:09:50 -0700
On Oct 30, 2004, at 9:29 AM, FireBrick wrote: I looked all over the box for the 5U4GB and couldn't find the IOTA number. You need to rectify that problem, pronto, Bill. 73 Chen, W7AY ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00413.html (7,545 bytes)

226. Re: [RTTY] 17" flat panel prices (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:21:24 -0800
And don't forget that you can often save some shelf or desk space by mounting the LCD display on an articulated arm. The better LCD panels have VESA standard mounting holes. By the way: just a word o
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00025.html (8,370 bytes)

227. Re: [RTTY] 17" flat panel prices (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:04:27 -0800
On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:44 AM, Peter Laws wrote: I'm not at N5UWY/9 right this moment, but these units are small. It's much smaller, physically, than the 15" CRT that it replaced and not just in depth.
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00029.html (8,884 bytes)

228. Re: [RTTY] 17" flat panel prices (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:13:14 -0800
On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Peter Laws wrote: I don't know if the mount on these is VESA-compliant - it wasn't a determinant for me. Is there a website that describes the VESA mounts? VESA is an ind
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00030.html (9,047 bytes)

229. Re: [RTTY] HAL ST-8000 (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:30:47 -0800
On Nov 9, 2004, at 12:12 PM, K7HPH wrote: Does anybody know if there are any Windows based RTTY DX/Contest programs available that will interface to RTTY TU's such as the HAL ST-8000? If you have a T
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00061.html (7,405 bytes)

230. Re: [RTTY] HAL ST-8000 (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:52:18 -0800
On Nov 9, 2004, at 1:09 PM, jduerbusch@charter.net wrote: There is a nice artice on putting the ST-8000 ahead of the PK-232 on my website: http://www.qsl.net/k0bx It is much easier to do than describ
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00064.html (9,467 bytes)

231. Re: [RTTY] Article on LCD Displays (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:24:33 -0800
On Nov 11, 2004, at 12:57 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: It's an interesting article, but misleading about the "density" of the display. Screen sizes and numbers of pixels are going up, but the physical
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00083.html (9,719 bytes)

232. Re: [RTTY] RE: Flat panels........... (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:54:35 -0800
On Nov 19, 2004, at 12:14 PM, Phil Cooper wrote: Going to flat panel monitors has reduced the noise significantly. The CRT's produced some big noise spikes at differing intervals on each band, and th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00140.html (9,372 bytes)

233. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - December 4th (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:15:06 -0800
W7TI wrote I see the webpage mentions an SWR [sic] category. I bet I could win that one! :-) Can I operate Single Op 2 Tuner in the SWR category? 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00170.html (6,918 bytes)

234. Re: [RTTY] PSN Modulation & PSK31 with Icom (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:22:08 -0800
On Nov 29, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote: Can someone tell me what this PSN modulation is and what advantage it is for SSB (not PSK31 obviously). My guess is it should be turned off for PSK3
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00176.html (8,614 bytes)

235. Re: [RTTY] Time wave 599zx (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:01:59 -0800
On Dec 5, 2004, at 4:09 PM, NOEL POULIN wrote: I would like to know if somebody using the Time Wave 599zx in RTTY mode. I have in mind buying one, but would like to have user's advice before I would
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00030.html (10,220 bytes)

236. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:34:25 -0800
On Dec 9, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Peter Laws wrote: -> But no mug for a clean sweep. How sweet that would be on RTTY! Pretty "shweet" as the kids all say. Nunavut is a little cold in January :-) 73 Chen, W
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00065.html (7,230 bytes)

237. Re: [RTTY] FSK vs AFSK (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:45:43 -0800
On Dec 10, 2004, at 4:58 AM, John Fleming wrote: It doesn't matter which you use if you know what you're doing. If you're not sure, use FSK. Properly operated, the guy on the other end can't tell the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00088.html (8,908 bytes)

238. Re: [RTTY] FSK vs AFSK (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:30:19 -0800
On Dec 10, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Reid Hill wrote: But FSK has a BIG advantage over AFSK for one reason in my mind, FILTERS. I have no problem at all with using narrow filters on my FT-1000MP in AFSK (wha
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00096.html (9,605 bytes)

239. Re: [RTTY] E-mail from VU4 Dxped re PSK31 for NA (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:46:54 -0800
On Dec 17, 2004, at 5:08 AM, Richard W. Solomon wrote: And don't tell me PSK is better for weak signals, it may be, but SSTV ?? For weak signal work, when there is no multipath, PSK is not maybe bett
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00120.html (8,312 bytes)

240. Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero" (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 01:26:22 -0800
On Dec 17, 2004, at 10:19 PM, Bill Turner wrote: I'm not sure when things changed, but they sure did. Nowdays, the zero and the "O" are differentiated by their thickness. A zero is skinny, an "O" is
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00128.html (9,014 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu