Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chen@mac.com: 990 ]

Total 990 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [RTTY] (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:40:15 -0800
On Dec 19, 2004, at 10:41 AM, K4SB wrote: If you run FSK to an FSK input jack on your radio, it is impossible to overdrive the radio or amp. Ed is correct, as long as you control the keying rise time
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00155.html (8,153 bytes)

242. Re: [RTTY] Bright Idea #99 (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:24:35 -0800
On Dec 19, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote: A few years ago QST ran an article on a class "E" amp (might have been "D"). VERY efficient - better than 90%, I think (so cooling problems are mini
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00167.html (8,880 bytes)

243. Re: [RTTY] VU4 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:30:44 -0800
On Dec 19, 2004, at 6:14 PM, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote: I'll go! I'll go!! This is the amazing thing about Doug. He goes off to these places to give us contacts and depriving himself of
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00176.html (7,635 bytes)

244. Re: [RTTY] VU4NRO on RTTY - soon (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:52:18 -0800
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:33 AM, Richard W. Solomon wrote: I think almost everyone on the "keys" needs VU4, I know I do, that makes two !! But considering the signal levels here in W1 land, I do not hold
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00204.html (8,461 bytes)

245. Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero" (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:48:45 -0800
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:47 AM, Peter Laws wrote: &Oslash; - I'm at work where I have a proper terminal. The character at the left margin is NOT ASCII, and I think that's what N1ND was referring to. Sur
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00214.html (9,844 bytes)

246. [RTTY] One AFSK data point. (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:05:51 -0800
Blame W4UK -- he made me do this! Just kidding. While exchanging e-mail with Jerry, it occurred to me that I should just temporarily configure the equipment in the shack so I can make some AFSK measu
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00223.html (10,429 bytes)

247. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:15:18 -0800
On Dec 30, 2004, at 9:56 AM, Bill Turner wrote: I have always run out of contest time with people still to work, hasn't everyone? Who has ever worked *every* station active during a contest? Not me f
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00262.html (6,979 bytes)

248. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Callsign Database (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:09:51 -0800
On Jan 4, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote: If you plan on operating the RTTY Roundup, please check the current database files for your callsign. Ummm, I see that AA6TY guy is still in the data
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00037.html (7,314 bytes)

249. Re: [RTTY] 3G0YP (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:42:43 -0800
On Jan 10, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Larry L Lindblom wrote: Sunday afternoon while CQing on 15 during RTTY RU I was called by 3G0YP who sent "599 001 73 from Easter Island." My 001 came from ZF2NT (Bruce N6
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00131.html (7,356 bytes)

250. Re: [RTTY] IC 756 Pro II and rtty (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:33:37 -0800
On Jan 17, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Jerry Pixton wrote: After investigating what was going on, I discover there are TWO settings that involve the filters that are available in RTTY mode. In previous tests,
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00206.html (7,899 bytes)

251. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 Clueless?/PSK31 Info & Clubs (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:48:35 -0800
On Jan 18, 2005, at 10:37 PM, DJ3IW Goetz wrote: And RST is always 599! Raise your hands, those of you who have sent 596 to a loud but wide RTTY station :-). On the other hand, I do see IMD numbers b
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00222.html (7,602 bytes)

252. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 Clueless?/PSK31 Info & Clubs (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:34:17 -0800
On Jan 19, 2005, at 11:25 AM, ws7i wrote: Raise your hand if you have operated a narrow-band mode, PSK31, which is very very narrow, with 2.4 Khz filters and then complained about a loud signal that
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00226.html (8,808 bytes)

253. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:06:50 -0800
On Jan 25, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Gordon LaPoint wrote: I agree with Art, I don't get an acknowledge when I'm S&P they might not be in my log when it goes in, especially if I work them later and they insi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00301.html (8,927 bytes)

254. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:14:00 -0800
On Jan 26, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Bill Turner wrote: If I understand you correctly, the %X macro would REPEAT my report back to me? The %X macro in cocoaModem is simply a macro which fetches the received
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00326.html (11,116 bytes)

255. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:41:24 -0800
On Jan 26, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Tom Moore wrote: SEVEN THREE (not seventy three, seventy threesss, or seventy thirds) You mean there is no such thing as a plural for UE? Best wishes'es. Chen, W7AY _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00332.html (9,383 bytes)

256. Re: [RTTY] HAL ST-8000 and 6000 vs. Sound Cards (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:41:20 -0800
On Jan 28, 2005, at 5:40 PM, w4gkm@juno.com wrote: I sure would like to get some input as to what everyone thinks about the HAL ST-8000 vs. sound cards. If you have used the HAL and the sound card wh
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00366.html (12,209 bytes)

257. Re: [RTTY] HAL ST-8000 and 6000 vs. Sound Cards (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:56:12 -0800
On Jan 29, 2005, at 9:12 AM, Neal Campbell and Sarah Ferrell wrote: As I believe in Don's recommendation to have a couple of different modem types for diversity, I would tend to take a soundcard-base
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00369.html (9,047 bytes)

258. Re: [RTTY] HAL ST-8000 and 6000 vs. Sound Cards (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:48:20 -0800
On Jan 29, 2005, at 6:23 AM, psussman@pactor.com wrote: Rather that TNCs are easier to set up because they come with instructions .... I think I agree with Phil here. My twist on the statement is tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00371.html (9,714 bytes)

259. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:06:35 -0800
On Feb 13, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote: IIRC, we were not allowed to use FSK until just a few years prior. RTTY didn't work well with on-off mark keying only. What a segway... :-) Early Sa
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00196.html (8,325 bytes)

260. Re: [RTTY] Unshifted Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:36:17 -0800
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:01 PM, NB1B wrote: What mechanism makes some programs send the letters instead of the numbers? I don't think the problem was on my rx end when someone would send me "TOO PPQ PPQ
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00236.html (8,974 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu