Mail Archive Search: <+from:david@levinecentral.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:david@levinecentral.com: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] BARTG start time / off time rule question (urgent!) (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:34:29 -0400; You can count the entire 2:55 as off time. Between contacts is where those limits count and not at the start our end. K2DSL - David _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00233.html (8,505 bytes)
102. Re: [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint Results Online (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:02:13 -0400; Ed, I wasn't able to participate but I did check out the results. I'm wondering why if I add up some of the 80+40+20m Q's, it doesn't equal the total QSOs listed while others do? I popped over to 383; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00244.html (7,765 bytes)
103. Re: [RTTY] Site for RTTY WAS list? (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 20:43:36 -0400; All my WAS submissions were 100% LoTW and anyone that got the Triple Play Award has to be 100% LoTW though it doesn't mean they also applied for WAS RTTY. David - K2DSL ______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00071.html (9,206 bytes)
104. Re: [RTTY] Site for RTTY WAS list? (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 12:51:45 -0400; I went to the site and it shows a large percentage of what is listed as 100% LoTW so I'm not sure what the poster was looking at. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00090.html (7,802 bytes)
105. Re: [RTTY] What's the reason for the "R" prefix? (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:59:07 -0400; The Royal Wedding - http://www.rsgb.org/news/articlelinks.php?id=0123 K2DSL - David _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00172.html (7,774 bytes)
106. Re: [RTTY] New RTTY Contest this weekend (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:53:16 -0400; I'm going to be heading to Dayton for the 1st time so I won't be on the air, but I looked over the rules at http://www.aegeandxgroup.gr/Aegean-RTTY-Contesr.php. Seems the only "classes" listed are si; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00062.html (8,448 bytes)
107. [RTTY] Potential issue with latest N1MM V11.7.2 release (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:19:01 -0400; Just wanted to get out there to any folks here that I ran into an issue with the latest N1MM 11.7.2 release and the behavior of LogThenPop. That's the function that allows you to stack calls and get; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00126.html (6,960 bytes)
108. Re: [RTTY] Potential issue with latest N1MM V11.7.2 release (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:25:26 -0400; Thanks Tom. Switching back to a prev version of N1MM (11.7.1, 11.7.0 or 11.6.4) and I don't have any issue with everything else (macros & config) staying the same. Updating to 11.7.2 causes the probl; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00133.html (10,235 bytes)
109. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:41:33 -0400; This has happened before where someone configured their program incorrectly and did something similar by sending O but had 0 in their config so their generated log showed number 0 and not the letter; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00141.html (10,348 bytes)
110. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:53:02 -0400; K7RE was in SD and in the contest and I worked him on 20/40. I worked K5BTK from MS and I agree that MS is often rarer then ND, SD & WY. I had a couple contacts with N1MGO in VT but personally didn't; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00152.html (9,282 bytes)
111. Re: [RTTY] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:57:53 -0400; Ed, I use N1MM and there are some real neat features but once in a while, if I'm not paying attention and do something out of sequence, where N1MM thinks I am in the exchange is different then where; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00170.html (8,618 bytes)
112. [RTTY] SARTG Category for Cabrillo? (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:26:26 -0400; Looking at the SRATG rules listed at http://www.sartg.com/contest/wwrules.htm it shows the following entry classes: A: Single Operator / Single TX / All Band B: Single Operator / Single Band C: Multi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00238.html (7,303 bytes)
113. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:23:13 -0400; I agree Don. Called CQ for a bit and got a few rookies and non-rookies which is fine too. MS is usually a tough state for me to find someone in and the second rookie I worked was from MS which is gre; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00245.html (7,931 bytes)
114. Re: [RTTY] Question (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:28:51 -0400; Depends what puts it there. You can email me directly ( david@levinecentral.com) and I'll try to help. I'll need to know what you are using to read your email. Might be a way to write a rule or confi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00246.html (8,017 bytes)
115. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:00:27 -0400; I didn't notice any "ROOKIES ONLY" being sent but I was in the contest for just under 1 hour after starting late and shutting down as a huge storm rolled in. I myself sent "CQ ROOKIES K2DSL K2DSL CQ"; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00257.html (10,570 bytes)
116. Re: [RTTY] Rookie Roundup scoring (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:57:43 -0400; Gary, See one of my previous replies. I used N1MM and the summary seemed to match the rules. Maybe WL is where the issue is? As a non-rookie, 2 points for a contact with a rookie and 0 points for con; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00269.html (8,960 bytes)
117. Re: [RTTY] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:01:06 -0400; For me, when running FSK with my TS-2000 I can take advantage of the tight filters which are essential in a contest. In AFSK the radio operates in SSB mode and the filters aren't as narrow. Other rad; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00287.html (7,650 bytes)
118. Re: [RTTY] Key down & 50% power (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:46:00 -0400; I have a Kenwood TS-2000 and run it at 100 watts for a 2 day contest without issue. I need all the help I can get with just wire dipoles. David almost designed at ____________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00327.html (8,447 bytes)
119. Re: [RTTY] BARTG 75 SPRINT TODAY 9/18 1700Z-2100Z (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:16:38 -0400; It was an excellent little contest. Short exchange and fast xmit @ 75 baud. I bet the SO2R pros can do 10+ Q's a minute. I felt the conditions to EU from the east coast (NJ) even on my little 'ol wir; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00042.html (8,190 bytes)
120. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:03:03 -0400; I purchased a SignaLink USB and it worked (and still works) great. I now use a custom built FSK interface so I can take advantage of the tight filters on my radio needed when in a RTTY contest. For c; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00072.html (9,564 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]