- 121. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:46:03 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I have sat here for several minutes trying to think of an adequate reply to the above nonsense. Can't do it. Bill, W6WRT ______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00332.html (9,990 bytes)
- 122. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:34:15 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Don't forget singling out amplifier owners, hams with buddies to help them operate and hams with packet/telnet. Oops... too late. They are already singled out.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00337.html (8,372 bytes)
- 123. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:36:49 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'm not sure I understand the question. Do you mean who owns the field or who plays on it? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mai
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00338.html (8,436 bytes)
- 124. Re: [RTTY] SO1R/SO2R listed in combined results? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:43:53 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Nit pick. I'll take either way as long as they are reported separately, not combined. I'm easy, really. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00340.html (8,264 bytes)
- 125. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:32:52 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Perhaps that's the crux of our differing viewpoints. Sure, there are many different kinds of advantages just as you mention, but IMO, two radios is the only on
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00357.html (7,978 bytes)
- 126. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:00:05 -0700
- Not necessarily. Some contests have a multi-op single TX category. Not so. There is a HUGE difference in listening time between one radio and two. The two radio guy can be looking for new stations an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00358.html (10,801 bytes)
- 127. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:14:24 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- The short answer is that gain antennas are useful in nearly all kinds of ham radio operating. Adding a second radio is useful mainly to contesters. I'm sure th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00360.html (8,782 bytes)
- 128. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:26:26 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Phil has pointed out the most important thing in the whole discussion. If and when all contest newbies realizes they can not be competitive without a second ra
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00362.html (8,904 bytes)
- 129. Re: [RTTY] A glimpse into the future... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:25:55 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- It would have the same excitement as watching two computers play chess. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00413.html (7,168 bytes)
- 130. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:39:44 -0700
- Not knowing what a STATIOIN is, I can't argue with the above. But I can say that more listening time will allow you to work more stations because you have more time to find more station, and more ban
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00416.html (11,403 bytes)
- 131. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:44:36 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Yep. Grandpa loved his 1932 Oldsmobile and then they built those damn freeways! What were they thinking of? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00417.html (8,998 bytes)
- 132. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:51:41 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- This statement shows such a total lack of understanding as to make one dizzy. "Time does not enter into the issue at all"... Boggles the mind. Bill, W6WRT ____
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00419.html (8,077 bytes)
- 133. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:55:20 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'm glad Geo. Washington had a somewhat different attitude. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00421.html (7,708 bytes)
- 134. Re: [RTTY] mark v field (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:11:49 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- For what it's worth, and to possibly help you avoid a big mistake... I had an IC-746PRO which got damaged by lightning last summer. I had used it for RTTY cont
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00423.html (7,760 bytes)
- 135. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:36:45 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Just so we all understand where W4TV is coming from: He is on a lot where he can not put up big antennas and so he wants to use two radios to overcome that dis
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00426.html (10,506 bytes)
- 136. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:39:20 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Nope, that's two radios in one box. Like others, you are confusing the number of radios with the number of boxes. Definition of one radio: When the TX is on th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00427.html (10,504 bytes)
- 137. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:42:30 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I proposed that at one time and you didn't like that either. Make up your mind. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00428.html (9,788 bytes)
- 138. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:45:48 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I know you meant that tongue in cheek, but it could actually be approximated. If two radios gives approximately a 40% score increase, and going from 100 watts
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00429.html (9,745 bytes)
- 139. Re: [RTTY] The Horse Died ! (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:50:44 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- And that is why God in his wisdom gave you a delete key. I tried it on your post and it worked fine. :-) Bill, W6WRT __________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00430.html (7,432 bytes)
- 140. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:53:57 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- That's not a problem Joe. All rules are like that. Fortunately in radio contesting, we can choose which rules we like by choosing which class we compete in. Bi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00432.html (8,628 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu