Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] Two sides (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:00:23 -0700
Radio contesting is and always will be between stations in the same general area. Many contest committees recognize this by listing scores by call area, section or state. A "national" winner is essen
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00433.html (8,879 bytes)

142. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:11:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- If a ham finds himself in this situation, he has a decision to make. Either accept the limitations or move. He should not try to finagle contest rules to suit
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00439.html (10,353 bytes)

143. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:20:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I would have sworn you stated the opposite, but if I'm wrong, I apologize. Perhaps you were making an observation about someone else's area and I mistook it fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00440.html (10,378 bytes)

144. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:26:46 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- That was just a suggestion to get the discussion started. The key element was an antenna limitation of some kind, with discussion to follow. I suggested the th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00443.html (10,323 bytes)

145. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:29:50 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- You've lived a sheltered life, Mike. Try Usenet sometime. And the word is "adios". Audios are for listening. Bill, W6WRT ______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00445.html (9,107 bytes)

146. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:33:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- This is America. It's ALWAYS an option. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00446.html (9,845 bytes)

147. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:35:39 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Excellent question Doug, and the answer is not whether something gives an advantage, but how much of an advantage. I have operated both high (1500w) and low (1
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00447.html (10,745 bytes)

148. [RTTY] What horse? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:53:47 -0700
Ok guys, I yield to common sense. No more one/two radio posts from me. (Sound of wild applause in background). At least for now. (Sound of boos in background). Thanks to all who participated in the d
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00449.html (6,696 bytes)

149. Re: [RTTY] A Different Definition of Single Operator 2 Radio (SO2R) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:36:55 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I see he is transmitting on all radios at once... naughty, naughty! On the other hand, who's going to turn him in? Not me! :-) Bill, W6WRT ____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00460.html (7,728 bytes)

150. Re: [RTTY] mark v field (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:44:02 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- That's possible. Here's what I didn't like: When I unplug the antenna on all other rigs, the audio goes completely quiet. With the Mark V, there is still a con
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00461.html (7,516 bytes)

151. Re: [RTTY] A Different Definition of Single Operator 2 Radio (SO2R) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:35:38 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Good question. Married is a handicap for some. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00488.html (8,157 bytes)

152. Re: [RTTY] How to handle a pileup on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:38:42 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- The only problem with sending the other guy's call last is that is not the traditional way of doing it. Normally, YOUR call goes last. A savvy op will usually
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00489.html (8,517 bytes)

153. Re: [RTTY] mark v field (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:41:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- OK, perhaps I had a bad one. If so, I stand corrected. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00490.html (7,519 bytes)

154. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:45:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- A little OT, but I was once mobiling on 40 meters and waiting at a red light behind a police car. I saw him key his mike and every time he did, my SWR meter in
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00491.html (8,054 bytes)

155. Re: [RTTY] YU6DZ - RTTY pirate! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:47:43 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Another argument in favor of LOTW, as if another was needed. :-) Not trying to start a flame war, just an observation. Bill, W6WRT ____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00492.html (7,614 bytes)

156. Re: [RTTY] Special award for AA5AU QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:25:50 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- How about 213? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/r
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00524.html (8,876 bytes)

157. Re: [RTTY] How to handle a pileup on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:43:41 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Speaking of wasting time, you don't really need the "DE". Because each Baudot character, including spaces, takes 167 ms, you are wasting almost exactly 1/2 sec
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00525.html (8,970 bytes)

158. Re: [RTTY] The other guy's TX is reversed (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:53:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- "Polarity" isn't exactly the right word. He is talking about the nature of the FSK keying signal going into the rig. Some rigs want an open for MARK, some want
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00526.html (8,687 bytes)

159. [RTTY] Strateby for Montenegro (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:59:47 -0700
Relax, guys. This is not a DXpedition where he will only be there a few days. Montenegro will be there long after we're pushing up daises. Instead of wasting hours calling, spend the time on your ant
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00527.html (6,925 bytes)

160. Re: [RTTY] The other guy's TX is reversed (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:23:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Right. Every rig has a default and nearly all have a way of reversing it. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00531.html (9,172 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu