Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] An overdriven signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:18:12 -0800
If you are near your radio and would like to hear an overdriven AFSK signal, go to 14083.2 for the main sig and about 2kHz lower for the overdrive. He's been on quite a while so if you hurry you can
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00370.html (6,697 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:54:24 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Just when I think I've heard everything... 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00382.html (7,329 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY SO1R Team Score (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:16:27 -0800
The 2R score divided by the 1R score = 1.58 or 158%. AA5AU, who knows about these things, was once quoted as saying going to SO2R would increase one's score by about 40%. Allowing for all the variabl
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00388.html (7,181 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Move To 1807.500 KC (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:49:49 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The 160 meter CW gang in the US is extremely vocal about their idea of what the bandplan should be and the ARRL caved in accordingl
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00392.html (8,342 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:59:46 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Very true and that's a shame. 160 is a great band for up to a few hundred miles easily and more with some power and big antennas. B
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00393.html (7,054 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] digital Interface? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:50:53 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Clint, I know this isn't what you asked, but I hate to see someone spend a lot of money on an interface you can build for a few buc
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00400.html (7,493 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:51:44 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Especially if someone spots you. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00401.html (7,519 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on 160Meters) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:39:33 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A great idea! Count me in, but lets not delay too long. Summer is approaching. One suggestion, though....please don't include the Q
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00418.html (7,996 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] 1999 RTTY HSS Score Summary... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:42:01 -0800
Those calls bring back some memories, don't they? Don't know why my previous call isn't there. I thought I worked all of the HSS's. Maybe not. 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00419.html (7,100 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on 160Meters) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:44:04 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> Eddie from WZ6, <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Speaking of Eddie, what ever became of him? Also N1RCT who used to win everything in sight? 73, Bill
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00420.html (7,881 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] [Kenwood] Changing a lightbulb (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:46:49 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A classic from long ago but still true today. People never really change, do they? Thanks for posting it Tom. Absolutely timeless.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00421.html (7,700 bytes)

32. [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:50:25 -0800
Has anyone ever worked all states on 160 RTTY? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00422.html (6,116 bytes)

33. [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:06:39 -0800
The magic word: split. How about CQ TEST 1838 DE <YOURCALL> for the US guys and CQ TEST 1805 DE <THE EUROPEANS> ? Substitute your own favorite frequency. Works for me. 73, Bill W6WRT ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00001.html (6,729 bytes)

34. [RTTY] Unclear on the concept (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:24:11 -0800
As I type I am listening to a WN5 calling CQ (CW) on 1805. I am tempted to reply to him with RTTY but good manners overwhelmed me. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ R
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00003.html (6,439 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:32:22 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Maybe it's just me, but working the same station over and over is a complete waste of time. The time spent working that guy is time
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00004.html (7,611 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:27:55 -0000
Bill, W6wrt _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00014.html (7,984 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:56:44 -0000
Well, if I had a choice between working the same station on the same band over and over or watching paint dry, I guess it would depend mostly on the color of the paint. Bill, W6WRT __________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00016.html (7,758 bytes)

38. [RTTY] The RTTY 160 Meter contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:13:28 -0800
There have been a number of good suggestions, but one thing I think we need to focus on is the purpose of the contest itself. In my opinion, it should be to further activity on 160 meter RTTY, especi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00019.html (7,379 bytes)

39. [RTTY] 1805 very active tonight (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:20:44 -0800
It's 0420 UTC as I write and 1805 has been busy for about the last two hours. If you need South Dakota on 160 RTTY, K0HW is there now. Join in! Bill, W6WRT ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00020.html (6,667 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] ARRL To QSY To 1807.500 KC (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 07:02:38 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I notice the 160 meter bandplan does not even mention any DX window at all. Between this glaring omission and the 40 meter RTTY DX
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00048.html (8,765 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu