Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:22:57 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Couldn't agree more. I've always thought 5BDXCC was the ruination of the Gentlemanly Sport of DXing. I have DXCC on four bands (accidentally) but if I ever accid
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00163.html (8,942 bytes)

302. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:41:09 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The infamous "Black Hole" of propagation has apparently moved from the American Midwest to the British Isles. Sorry, Phil! Bill W6WRT ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00165.html (7,847 bytes)

303. Re: [RTTY] Re the blacklisting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:45:00 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That was inexcusably rude of them. Let's hope THEY don't make that mistake again. For shame. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00166.html (7,868 bytes)

304. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:34:56 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That's my point. Before 5BDXCC and the explosion of other awards, I don't remember the ravenous behavior of the award-obsessed chasers. Back then, you worked a c
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00168.html (9,105 bytes)

305. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:26:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I agree that the problems existed before, but 5BDXCC and the other awards have multiplied the problem many times. Previously the lids only did their lid behavior
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00176.html (9,480 bytes)

306. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:31:37 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- This can be a software problem as well, especially when using a spotting network. Some software will turn off the split mode when clicking on a spot. Until you g
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00177.html (9,332 bytes)

307. Re: [RTTY] gentlemanly spot (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:38:28 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You have your opinion, I have mine. I believe there was at one time. Sorry you missed it. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00178.html (7,038 bytes)

308. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:42:12 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Right you are. Packet slipped my mind, but it surely is a major contributor to the mess. But as you say, while deploring it, I like it too. Kind of like ice crea
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00179.html (9,454 bytes)

309. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:57:24 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I see I have pressed a hot button on you. I never meant to imply that 5BDXCC wasn't hard work or a sign of a dedicated op or anything of the like. I was pointing
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00181.html (9,536 bytes)

310. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:26:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Remember tuning across 75 meters in the AM days? Wall to wall heterodynes. I'm embarrassed to admit I was one of the AM'ers who resisted SSB for quite a while. L
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00187.html (9,893 bytes)

311. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:39:09 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Those are all just theoretical modes of operating. I doubt if they will ever amount to anything. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00189.html (8,118 bytes)

312. [RTTY] N8S low band RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 06:57:06 -0700
Haven't heard any low band RTTY for the last couple of days. Sure would like to work them on 160. Time's getting short. Sigh. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY maili
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00191.html (6,567 bytes)

313. Re: [RTTY] N8S low band RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:14:37 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- My personal holy grail. Let's hope! :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00195.html (7,137 bytes)

314. Re: [RTTY] N8S changing software (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:22:44 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That explains it. Thanks for a great job, Doug. Did you ever try any 160 meter RTTY? The last time I checked the log webpage it showed zero. You were loud
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00203.html (7,507 bytes)

315. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:40:53 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Some stations send up 2 and mean exactly that, no more, no less. I would probably send up 2-5 pr something similar. Not a big deal, most guys figure it out prett
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00208.html (8,067 bytes)

316. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:51:23 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Why would you say up 1 instead of just up? Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00216.html (8,011 bytes)

317. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:49:59 -0700
"UP" without any qualifiers just means higher than your TX frequency. If you mean up 1 or up 5, say so. To avoid a reputation as a prevaricator. Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00223.html (8,338 bytes)

318. Re: [RTTY] UP 1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:55:26 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You could not be more wrong if you worked at it for a hundred years. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00224.html (6,826 bytes)

319. Re: [RTTY] New RTTY station...New setup. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:03:44 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- It's likely you have your mark and space reversed, a situation known as being "upside down". I will be available tonight between 0200 and 0300 UTC for a schedule
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00254.html (7,027 bytes)

320. Re: [RTTY] New radio from Elecraft, the K3,looks REALLY good for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:17:05 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Looks very good on paper. I'd like to see a head to head comparison with the IC-756Pro3. By the time you add all the options the Pro3 comes with, the price would
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00271.html (9,365 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu