Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 330 ]

Total 330 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:18:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That statement caught my attention. What is desirable about odd numbers? Bill, W6WRT ______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00348.html (9,187 bytes)

282. Re: [RTTY] Macro Setup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:34:37 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Anybody that dumb is going to dupe you regardless. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00353.html (7,441 bytes)

283. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:36:11 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I use three myself, but that wasn't the question. The question was why odd numbers? 5, 7, 9? 101? Bill, W6WRT _____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00354.html (9,243 bytes)

284. Re: [RTTY] why in multiples of 3? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:18:43 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ok. Ok. Ok. 73, Bill W6WRT 73, Bill W6WRT 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00364.html (6,757 bytes)

285. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:49:58 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Item 5 would allow encryption of personal information during emergencies. As long as that restriction were written into the FCC rul
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00371.html (10,572 bytes)

286. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:14:41 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we RTTY'ers abandon the 170 Hz shift and use something narrower? Something that would fit in the proposed 200 Hz sub-band?
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00372.html (9,995 bytes)

287. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:00:00 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Shift is not the same as bandwidth, as the mathematicians among us will be quick to point out. RTTY is a form of FM, and FM produce
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00379.html (9,982 bytes)

288. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:05:47 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That would appear to be correct. The question, however, is do we want to? The point of the revised band plan is to reduce or elimin
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00389.html (7,754 bytes)

289. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:11:37 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Just powered it up for the first time about 20 minutes ago. No RF yet, just DC, but it sat there and idled at 160 mA, 3200 on the p
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00390.html (9,816 bytes)

290. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:22:16 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You're right. I was referring to my take on it. I have a lot of company, too. Bill, W6WRT _________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00398.html (8,180 bytes)

291. [RTTY] Narrow RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:15:33 -0800
Just had a long chat with W7AY on 7085 using very narrow RTTY. We started out with 170 Hz shift and then went to 23 Hz. I transmitted a canned macro (the word TEST repeated 36 times) at 100 watts, th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00400.html (7,423 bytes)

292. Re: [RTTY] - "Freely available software" (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:48:06 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How about SO2R running 23 Hz RTTY signing /QRP? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00418.html (8,800 bytes)

293. [RTTY] Listening for 23 Hz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:23:37 -0800
It's 1520z on Tuesday. Listening 7088 for 23 Hz (or any odd shift) RTTY. I'll be here till about 1700z. Give me a call and let's play. Make it a long call so I can get things set. Bill, W6WRT _______
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00420.html (6,711 bytes)

294. Re: [RTTY] Listening for 23 Hz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:59:00 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ok, I will tomorrow at about the same time. No copy on the intruder here. Bill, W6WRT _____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00427.html (7,365 bytes)

295. Re: [RTTY] what setting to ft100mp user settings for 23hz shift (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:04:20 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here are the directions if you are using FSK. For people using AFSK I think it is simpler since you should only have to change the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00428.html (8,646 bytes)

296. Re: [RTTY] Listening for 23 Hz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:00:10 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi Hisami: I am listening on 7029.5 now but perhaps I am too late. Time is 1559 UTC. Will continue listening for a while, and tomor
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00450.html (7,635 bytes)

297. [RTTY] W6WRT UK DX RTTY score (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:31:19 -0800
Worked CN on 40 with LP and dipole, so condx on low bands were good. Sigs on 80 very strong but not too many on. Nothing heard on 10 at all. 2006 UK DX Contest, RTTY Call: W6WRT Operator(s): W6WRT St
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00478.html (6,650 bytes)

298. Re: [RTTY] UKDX RTTY AA5VU Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:49:55 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ RIT may be at fault sometimes, but AFC can be the culprit too. AFC is great when running, but when going to S&P one should turn it
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00486.html (7,761 bytes)

299. [RTTY] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:17:42 -0800
Wondering... For those who like to change bands a lot. Rather than spend between five and ten thousand dollars for an auto-tune amp like the 87a or similar, why not build separate amps for each band
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00488.html (7,782 bytes)

300. Re: [RTTY] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:06:53 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you mean "automatic" in the sense of RF-detection and "no-hands", I would agree. A manual switching operation with a single rota
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00493.html (7,688 bytes)

Current List: 281 - 300
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
This search system is powered by Namazu