Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@yahoo.com: 1608 ]

Total 1608 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:11:31 -0700
I didn't notice this at all. To me, the confirmation is either QSL or TU, and I wait for one or the other on every QSO. During the recent contest I don't believe I had a single QSO without receiving
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00218.html (8,568 bytes)

42. Re: [RTTY] Why QR for the section???? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:19:22 -0700
The reason is the other station had USOS turned off and you had it turned on. It is HIGHLY recommended that everybody have USOS turned on. USOS is a great invention, but either both stations must use
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00219.html (8,688 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:49:02 -0700
Interesting idea. At present I have my RUN TU macro as: <CALL> TU W6WRT CQ I'm afraid if I change it to TU <CALL> W6WRTCQ there is a chance that if I have the other station's call wrong he may see on
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00224.html (8,808 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:54:29 -0700
I also send his call twice just as in your example. You have a good point, so I think I will change my confirmation message to be like yours. Thanks. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- ___________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00230.html (8,683 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] N1MM Cabrillo format error (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:31:12 -0700
You are right. I used the Notepad fix before I realized where the problem was actually originating. Ideally, N1MM Logger should format Cabrillo in the right order regardless, or at least force the se
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00238.html (8,594 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] Why QR for the section???? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:38:53 -0700
Technically, you are correct, but several of us have waged a long and hard war to eliminate the use of hyphens and I really don't want to see them raise their ugly heads again. :-) A great many conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00240.html (9,124 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:44:21 -0700
Not to mention N1RCT, WF1B and of course, AA6TY. Ahhhh... the good 'ol days. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00259.html (9,346 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:57:56 -0700
Agreed. In the macro, put the state first, but in the Cabrillo file, put the zone first. And if you can still remember that by this time next year, I hereby award you an extra 500 bonus points. :-) 7
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00261.html (9,858 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:07:49 -0700
There must be two memos. The memo I got says don't use hyphens, ever. Any long time contester knows what TOOAWT means because he's seen it a jillion times. The first meaning is "599 25". The second m
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00263.html (9,245 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:37:28 -0700
Big Ron K5DJ is still around, distributing WriteLog software, but the last log entry I have for him was in the 2001 Roundup. Ron used to win 'em all, didn't he? Awesome contester. 73, Bill W6WRT -- O
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00265.html (8,316 bytes)

51. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:49:53 -0700
Well, that would be ok as long as it simulates a virtual hyphen too. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00268.html (8,627 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] Odd call (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:27:00 -0700
Don is really scary. Just think what he could do if he was serious. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00274.html (7,593 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:29:53 -0700
You should never send your call before you know the other guy's call because he might be a dupe. The reason for the CQ at the end is so that when you tune across someone and print W6WRT W6WRT CQ then
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00279.html (10,206 bytes)

54. Re: [RTTY] A new guys experiences from the contest (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:36:07 -0700
It is best to send only your call until the other guy has it right. If you also send the exchange he may only see the exchange and not realize he has your call wrong. Be persistent - send your call o
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00299.html (7,795 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:39:59 -0700
This is what Super Check Partial is for. N5UWY is in the database, N9UWY is not. See above. Sometimes, not always. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00300.html (9,092 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:12:17 -0700
Does your opposition extend to computer-checked dupes? 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00318.html (9,579 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:20:27 -0700
Do you use computerized dupe checking? Doesn't that match a newly-received call against a database? Does your software warn you about logging invalid exchanges by checking them against a database? 73
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00319.html (9,553 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:25:17 -0700
You raise a very good question, although I don't consider manual dupe checking a "skill". A person with no knowledge of radio at all could do that. So, what do we have left? 1. Propagation knowledge.
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00322.html (10,400 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:27:13 -0700
If you follow the contesting reflector, this has been a MAJOR point of discussion. I finally got tired of it and unsubscribed. RTTY is my passion anyway. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00323.html (9,548 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:19:05 -0700
you are making my points for me. I thought it was you that was bemoaning the lack of the human touch in contesting. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00326.html (15,250 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu