Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@yahoo.com: 1608 ]

Total 1608 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:12:37 -0800
How about if they ran the truck race in one tiny parking space in the far corner of the parking lot? If the RTTY guys hang out around 1808 +/- .5 kHz, do you think the CW guys could find enough room
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00143.html (8,058 bytes)

82. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:21:03 -0800
AMEN. 160 meters is never crowded, even during major contests. The ARRL bandplan recommends the bottom 10 kHz for digital modes and there probably won't be enough contesters on that weekend to fill u
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00144.html (9,084 bytes)

83. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:01:45 -0800
Ok, let's all listen and see how much of the band is "wall to wall" during the contest and report back here. I'll bet it is mostly empty outside the bottom 50 or so kHz. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL ME
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00160.html (8,378 bytes)

84. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:14:11 -0800
Is there some reason the CW guys do not respect the ARRL bandplan which allocates 1800-1810 for digital modes? They all seem to want to jam into the bottom 50 hKz or so. Why not move the jam up 10 kH
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00161.html (9,630 bytes)

85. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:17:53 -0800
New Hampshire would be a new state for me on 160 RTTY. I'll be looking for you! 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00162.html (7,361 bytes)

86. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:49:26 -0800
So the bottom 70 kHz is filled up. Last time I checked the band was 200 kHz wide and CW is allowed anywhere. I know antennas are narrowbanded on 160 but a little cleverness might give one a competiti
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00165.html (7,784 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:54:02 -0800
Given what you say below, what is all the fuss about? For me, it is an opportunity to pick up a few new states on 160 RTTY. Winning the contest is not an issue. I'll leave that to others. Anything wr
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00166.html (8,779 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:04:49 -0800
If you were literally the ONLY one, then there would be no competitive edge, of course. As I was trying to point out, being able to operate a wider band segment that some other stations would indeed
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00178.html (8,588 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:08:48 -0800
Agreed. It could be a long lonely weekend, but if it was easy I probably would lose interest. After all I have worked all states a bazillion times on the other bands with RTTY, but not yet on 160 RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00179.html (8,459 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:14:30 -0800
I wasn't aware of this happening. I never but never operate RTTY below 14075. Never even listen down there. Sorry for the QRM. It should not happen. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- ____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00180.html (9,855 bytes)

91. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:22:36 -0800
You make a good point, so let me rephrase it a little. How does operating CW in a designated RTTY segment give the CW guy a right to complain about the RTTY signals there? It's not like the band is F
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00181.html (10,156 bytes)

92. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:24:43 -0800
Ok, "allocate" was not the best choice of words. I will replace it with "suggest". 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00182.html (9,006 bytes)

93. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:35:40 -0800
Well, here's your chance to show your good will and gentlemanly behavior to all hams by adjusting to the changing times. What do you say? 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00183.html (8,852 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:24:54 -0800
I know you're speaking tongue in cheek, but I for one would be happy to do RTTY in that segment if the ARRL would change their band plan. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00191.html (8,352 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:37:21 -0800
Mama dodn't understand the lure of 160, did she? :-) 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00192.html (9,975 bytes)

96. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:59:46 -0800
The ARRL band plans do not have the force of law to be sure, but to say they mean "nothing' is a bit much. I see them as a valid attempt to address issues which the FCC does not and I accept them as
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00194.html (8,388 bytes)

97. Re: [RTTY] TARA RTTY Melee - Dec 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:20:22 -0800
I see I need to get on my horse! Have you worked Hawaii or Alaska on 160 yet? I haven't worked either one. 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY m
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00202.html (7,729 bytes)

98. [RTTY] 160 meters tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:25:01 -0800
Will be on 1808 tonight starting around 0100 UTC, on and off throughout the evening. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00209.html (7,033 bytes)

99. Re: [RTTY] 160 meters tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:16:13 -0800
Well, I COULD leave the TX on the whole time.... 73, Bill W6WRT -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00212.html (7,168 bytes)

100. Re: [RTTY] WY ON 1.808 RTTY... (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:28:55 -0800
Jack was quite loud down here in So California. Band was in good shape, noise was very low. Worked a new state, South Carolina (KR1ST), and a new province, Ontario (VE3WQ). Hope to see more activity
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00218.html (7,274 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu