Mail Archive Search: <+from:dl6jz@t-online.de>

Results:

References: [ +from:dl6jz@t-online.de: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] HAMVENTION, HAMRADIO & HAMFAIR (score: 1): Author: dl6jz@t-online.de (Wolf, DL6JZ); Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:28:25 +0200 (CEST); Hi Ari, tnx for your posting. The exact place of the RTTYer's meeting is not sure at the moment. You will be informed about it at time. I would be glad to meet you in person. 73 + 55 Wolf, DL6JZ Arie; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00065.html (8,172 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] ANARTS 2005 - YO9HP SOAB HP (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:58:10 -0000; Hi Alex, I like to remember our meeting in Friedrichshafen last year. Sorry that you won't be there this year again. Thank you for this special greetings and good luck in A4-land. Hope to see you onc; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00117.html (8,671 bytes)
43. [RTTY] DL-DX RTTY DF0WF M/S HP (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:13:38 -0000; DL-DX RTTY Contest Call: DF0WF Operator(s): DK2AB, DL6JZ Station: DF0WF Class: M/S HP QTH: Operating Time (hrs): 24 Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 62 600 24 40: 105 1080 40 20: 180 2079 64 15: 9; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00069.html (7,409 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] KJ4QF North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: dl6jz@t-online.de (Wolf, DL6JZ); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:52:22 +0200 (CEST); When I had this problem this last time one leg of the balun was not connected with the beam. :-)) 73 + 55 Wolf, DL6JZ Andrew J. O'Brien schrieb: _______________________________________________ RTTY m; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00172.html (8,289 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] 30m RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:14:33 -0000; Hello Bill, you are right. I was in Liechtenstein (HB0) for holiday 2 weeks ago. The only antenna I took with me was a vertical for the WARC bands (10.1, 18.1 and 24.9 MHz). I made about 450 QSOs in; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00269.html (8,327 bytes)
46. Re: [RTTY] Post-contest thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:36:58 -0000; I am sure there are more than 2 reasons for a dupe. 3. Only one operator logged the first QSO and the other didn't (and therefore several reasons exist again). 4. I tune into a rtty signal and I see; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00172.html (9,116 bytes)
47. [RTTY] DL6JZ: SOAB, LP (score: 1): Author: dl6jz@t-online.de (Wolf, DL6JZ); Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:11:25 +0200 (CEST); CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: DL6JZ Operator(s): DL6JZ Station: DL6JZ Class: SOAB LP QTH: Operating Time (hrs): 40 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 225 422 3 41 8 40: 212 466 1; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00193.html (7,763 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] WAE rules for off time? (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:55:24 +0100; Hi, you are right. If you make one off time of more than 12 hours then you fullfill the rules. But for instance it is wrong to start the contest at 03:10 Z and make then 3 off times of 3 hours each.; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00052.html (7,685 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] WAE RTTY Mults (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:22:50 -0000; Hi Scott, I think you remeber a little bit wrong. When I checked my logs of 2003 and 2004 there was only one column for the mults. And now iin my version 10.54 it is the same again. So I think we to; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00070.html (7,360 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] SM5FUG QRT.. No Katrina in Sweden, but..... :-( (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:00:58 +0100; Hi Jan, that are bad news! And there were a lot of bad news in the last time. But I hope for you that your QTH will be rebuild better than it was originally. And I hope that you didn't lose any impor; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00118.html (8,167 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] WAE QSO POINTS - WRITELOG? (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:21:39 +0100; Hi Jerry, you are right. There is no sentence in the official rules that every QSO counts one (1) point. But you can read in chapter 8. Scoring: "The final score is the result of total QSOs plus QTCs; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00119.html (8,922 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] How about this! (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:35:19 +0100; Hi Phil, tks for the QSO in WAEDC. Your operation technics was fine as usual. The problem you described is a very hard case. But who had invented exchanges like: ...................DL6JZ DL6JZ de <hi; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00123.html (8,314 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] (WAE RTTY ZL4BR (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:58:28 +0100; Hi Frank, I must tell you that the problem of not enough stations for a 48 hours contest stands on the European side also. I made about 420 QSOs/330 QTCs during my first 19 hours of activity and abou; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00125.html (9,365 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] How about this! (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:57:58 +0100; Hi Andy, I heard you very often with a strong signal in the last contest. 1. Standard exchange: I changed my standard exchange from 3 * serial to 2 * serial this year. Because the chance to copy 3 di; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00134.html (8,911 bytes)
55. [RTTY] WAEDC: DL6JZ, SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:16:27 -0000; Hello RTTY contester, thank you for an exciting weekend! First my claimed result: 2005 WAEDC RTTY CONTEST CALL: DL6JZ CATEGORY: Single Op, Low Power Club Competition: DRCG (DL-DX RTTY CONTEST GROUP); /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00148.html (8,708 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] CN2WW fm 19/11 to 28/11 (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:16:13 +0100; Hi Patrick, congrats for your trip to CN. I would like to work you in RTTY on the WARC bands, since there was a very big effort by the BCC in CQWW SSB and CW some years ago. But that's my personal op; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00149.html (7,847 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY Log address? (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:14:17 -0000; Hi, I sent my log to waedc@dxhf.darc.de and received the reception acknowledge about one hout later. What kind of problem do you have? Is there an error message or so? Your mail is not very precise e; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00012.html (7,258 bytes)
58. Re: [RTTY] State exchanges in RU (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:58:49 -0000; Hi, one of my "rules from iron" is never to send my exchange before the operator of the CQ-ing station sent my call correct back to me. And for poor conds in special cases I have a macro with 5 times; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00145.html (8,883 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY on NCDXF Beacon] (score: 1): Author: "Wolf (DL6JZ)" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:23:02 +0100; Hi Robert, first, you must be a good RTTY-contester because we had a QSO in the Roundup. :-)) Plus/minus 2 kHz is too much for the free space for the NCDXF beacon system. I think plus/minus 500 Hz wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00191.html (9,409 bytes)
60. [RTTY] DL6JZ: ARRL RTTY RU/SOLP (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:07:58 -0000; Hello all, it was an exciting weekend again. Here is my result. Call: DL6JZ Operator(s): DL6JZ Station: DL6JZ Class: Single Op LP QTH: Oderberg Operating Time (hrs): 21:45 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 1; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00211.html (7,831 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]