- 101. Re: [RTTY] Many thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:22:39 -0400
- My pleasure, Fabi! Hope you and Guylaine enjoy the wine. Don and I are thrilled that the contest went well and so many people had a good time. Ed - W0YK ______________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00285.html (8,219 bytes)
- 102. Re: [RTTY] Multiple Decoders (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:30:03 -0400
- Use a generic Y-adapter to feed the receiver audio into the soundcard LINE IN input for MMTTY and the DXP38 (or other hardware modem) audio input jack. Ed - W0YK _____________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00000.html (7,238 bytes)
- 103. Re: [RTTY] Multiple Decoders (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:26:58 -0400
- Many of us have been doing multiple decoders for years now, particularly the DXP38 plus multiple instances of MMTTY with different profiles. Just put a Y-adapter your radio's audio output and feed on
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00004.html (8,482 bytes)
- 104. Re: [RTTY] Multiple Decoders (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 01:26:26 -0400
- Standard, Flutter (FIR), Multipath and any or all of Hypersensitive, AA6YQ and EU1SA. The key is diversity so that odds are increased that at least one decoder will print clear text. Ed - W0YK ______
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00043.html (8,206 bytes)
- 105. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 01:36:45 -0400
- The 2012 CQ WPX season opens in less than 10 days with the RTTY mode on 11-12 February, followed by SSB in March and CW in May. With 10 meters back and activity continuing to rise in all three modes,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00044.html (8,713 bytes)
- 106. Re: [RTTY] Multiple Decoders (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:17:36 -0400
- For the SO2R ops, using one PC per radio helps because you have a separate LCD for each radio's multiple decode windows. Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00047.html (8,348 bytes)
- 107. [RTTY] 2012 CQ WPX Triathlon (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:17:36 -0400
- How mode-versatile are you? New this year is the CQ WPX Triathlon Award, for the highest cumulative-scoring Single-Op making at least 500 QSOs in each of the three modes: RTTY, SSB and CW. Here are t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00048.html (7,520 bytes)
- 108. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 22:02:07 -0400
- You can sign simply W3NR if you'd like. This part of the rules has not changed for many years. The portable designation is only required if the base call sign does not denote the country of operation
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00064.html (9,399 bytes)
- 109. Re: [RTTY] prop condx for wpx (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:15:55 -0400
- My guess is that east-west propagation on 10 will be down from the best we've seen this season so far, but it should still provide some QSOs. The north-south path should be great, though, so don't fo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00107.html (7,931 bytes)
- 110. [RTTY] Pileup Management (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:39:58 -0400
- I am often asked how I handle the horrendous RTTY pileups that develop here in Aruba in and out of contests. Here is my response: 1. I use very narrow filtering in my receiver so that I only see the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00112.html (8,431 bytes)
- 111. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:36:58 -0400
- Please, PLEASE, do not ever remove any QSOs from your log! Especially dupes are no consequence in the log. It is all sorted out in log checking. If you remove a QSO that is in another log, then that
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00130.html (8,427 bytes)
- 112. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:11:40 -0400
- There is no "limit" to the number of dupes you can have in your log. There is no disqualification or any consequence at all for having any number of dupes in your log. In the days before electronic l
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00183.html (17,626 bytes)
- 113. Re: [RTTY] Dupes now sorted what about busted serial's (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:16:52 -0400
- Once again, please do not remove QSOs from your log, if there is any chance that the other side of the QSO is in another log. If you busted the serial number, leave the QSO as is. If it is blank or '
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00184.html (10,687 bytes)
- 114. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:21:59 -0400
- In today's log checking, even paper logs are handled the same way. There are so few of them, we just get them entered into a Cabrillo file and run them with the rest of the logs in the log check soft
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00186.html (10,093 bytes)
- 115. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:52:58 -0400
- Stack usage is not yet well-defined and probably several approaches can be argued as valid. Here's mine: 1. I am very careful to stack calls in the order that they print in my RTTY decoder window(s).
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00190.html (13,319 bytes)
- 116. Re: [RTTY] Dupes now sorted what about busted serial's (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:55:34 -0400
- This is good practice although some log check software won't accept '000' as a valid serial number. So, it would be safer, and ease the load on log check volunteers, if you used '001' as your dummy s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00191.html (10,240 bytes)
- 117. Re: [RTTY] Dupes now sorted what about busted serial's (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:59:42 -0400
- No and maybe. No, the station who busted the exchange and puts '001' in the serial number field did not have a valid QSO and log checking will not count his QSO because it will not cross-check with t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00196.html (9,122 bytes)
- 118. Re: [RTTY] Dupes, and handling them (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:48:01 -0400
- Inferring you're the serial number sent to you by copying the serial number from the subsequent QSO works most of the time, but not always. A common discrepancy comes from SO2R stations where serial
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00274.html (8,655 bytes)
- 119. Re: [RTTY] Macros again (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:29:22 -0800
- TU W0YK CQ If I sense there might be confusion, then I pre-pend this message with the <his call> message, but this is very rare. Sure, there is always possibility for confusion, but my error rate and
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00280.html (8,467 bytes)
- 120. Re: [RTTY] N1MM New feature (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:51:36 -0800
- I applaud Rick and the N1MM team for listening carefully to user input and responding thoughtfully. This is yet another example of their dedication to N1MM users. At the same time, the use of "FIFO M
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00298.html (8,709 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu