Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:39:11 -0700
EXTFSK produces timing jitter that can make the signal harder to decode, depending on many aspects of a given situation, such as weak signal strength, QRM, QSB, QRN, etc. It works, just not as well a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00166.html (9,299 bytes)

222. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone Engine (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:48:52 -0700
No. David G3YYD wrote 2Tone expressly for N1MM Logger and has explicitly said he will not provide a stand-alone version. Moreover, he does not support it on any other loggers, despite the fact that i
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00171.html (7,843 bytes)

223. Re: [RTTY] JARTS (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:17:58 -0700
The JARTS rule could be interpreted either way. BARTG is very explicit in saying that the prefix, or /#, must indicate the call area of operation. But, the JARTS rules leaves this open to interpretat
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00236.html (8,311 bytes)

224. Re: [RTTY] WW RTTY JARTS (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:30:40 -0700
Based on the Subject of this email, I'm guessing the question is about the CQ WW RTTY Contest. (Or, is it a repeat of the question about JARTS? If so, see my prior post.) The CQ WW RTTY Contest count
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00239.html (7,199 bytes)

225. Re: [RTTY] NP3D (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:58:32 -0800
Yes, Andy had an unexpected heart attack. His family is shocked. No one saw it coming. So, your comments below are spot on. Condolences to Andy's family and may he rest in peace. Don, best wishes for
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00033.html (10,926 bytes)

226. [RTTY] October NA RTTY Sprint Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:59:52 -0800
The preliminary results for October's NA RTTY Sprint are now on the NCJ website: http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintrttyprelim.php Final results will be published in the Jan/Feb NCJ. If you have any questio
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00068.html (7,035 bytes)

227. Re: [RTTY] There's a 10m RTTY contest this weekend, right? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:42:31 -0800
Sunday UTC. The TARA RTTY Melee is Saturday UTC. Ed W0YK Just checking! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00006.html (7,176 bytes)

228. Re: [RTTY] There's a 10m RTTY contest this weekend, right? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:23:26 -0800
One of the design criteria for the Ten-Meter RTTY Contest was that contest loggers did not have to create another contest module. Note that the rules for this contest are identical to the ARRL RTTY R
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00019.html (9,300 bytes)

229. Re: [RTTY] There's a 10m RTTY contest this weekend, right? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:42:25 -0800
In fact, the rules for the Ten-Meter RTTY Contest state ... 6.3. All logs must be submitted in Cabrillo file format. The CONTEST tag in the Cabrillo header for this contest is TEN-RTTY. However, subm
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00021.html (10,043 bytes)

230. Re: [RTTY] Why 150W LP in Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:20:09 -0800
The Low Power limit for all ARRL HF contests is 250 watts. It was set when most radios were 150 watts. Most modern radios are 100 watts, so one could argue 100 watts is more appropriate. CQ contests
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00221.html (8,158 bytes)

231. Re: [RTTY] Why 150W LP in Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:48:40 -0400
150 proof. Typo ;>) Ed set when >most radios were 150 watts. Most modern radios are 100 watts, so one could >argue 100 watts is more appropriate. CQ contests are 100 watts. Ed, How was the harvest th
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00224.html (8,503 bytes)

232. [RTTY] P49X QSOs on LotW (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:31:01 -0400
I uploaded my P49X log to LotW just now, including the 82 QSOs on 30m RTTY today and the NCCC practice tonight. (18 of the 82 30m QSOs are already confirmed as QSLs ... you folks are animals!) In fac
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00007.html (7,142 bytes)

233. [RTTY] P49X WARC (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 01:34:37 -0400
I plan to work the WARC bands on RTTY next Monday and Tuesday for those who are interested. Ed P49X _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00014.html (7,006 bytes)

234. Re: [RTTY] P49X WARC [update] (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:23:06 -0400
P49X was active yesterday (Monday, 6 January UTC) on all three WARC bands. Not many takers, so operation was on and off every 1-2 hours since there are lots of other priorities besides listening to u
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00098.html (8,785 bytes)

235. Re: [RTTY] P49X WARC [update] (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:27:03 -0400
Correction: P49X LotW is up-to-date as of 0437, 7 Jan 2014. P49X was active yesterday (Monday, 6 January UTC) on all three WARC bands. Not many takers, so operation was on and off every 1-2 hours sin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00099.html (9,202 bytes)

236. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup minimum off time? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:05:55 -0400
Unfortunately, that's right. The 25 minutes will not be counted as off-time in log checking. Therefore, the last 25 minutes of QSOs will not count in your score calculation, although they do count fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00103.html (8,632 bytes)

237. Re: [RTTY] Multi-Single Roundup Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:17:19 -0500
ARRL is unlikely to make a different MS rule for Round-Up vs. their other contests. I have long advocated making MS at least as capable as SO, specifically eliminating the band change rule. There wou
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00208.html (8,896 bytes)

238. Re: [RTTY] question re: MTTY, N1MM sound (tone) in your headphones (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:16:06 -0800
Think of the RTTY audio tones coming from your radio in the same way as the CW audio pitch. You can choose the volume and audio frequency you want to listen to. This is entirely a local operator pref
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00276.html (13,521 bytes)

239. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Practices (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 03:13:00 -0400
Thursday afternoon and evening, NA time: 2200-2230Z, Thursday, 6 February (convenient for Europe) 0300-0330Z, Friday, 7 February These practices are a good way to check out your station to be sure al
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00146.html (8,320 bytes)

240. Re: [RTTY] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:23:38 -0400
Agree, for me as well, since the major LotW IT upgrade several months ago. LotW has been up 99% of the time and nearly instantly processes my logs, even right after a major contest. I uploaded my 414
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00179.html (8,857 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu