Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY scores database (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:27:40 -0400
The 2014 data hasn't been uploaded yet. I'm told it may happen this weekend. Should have happened months ago. The 2014 results are there, but not the data in the Scores Database. Ed W0YK ____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00060.html (7,495 bytes)

322. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:27:24 -0400
Over 1300 logs are already through the robot and in the log server. Make sure you get yours in by this Friday. Also, while the contest is still fresh in your mind, send your comments and stories plus
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00073.html (6,724 bytes)

323. Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:08:01 -0700
Currently scheduled for the May CQ magazine. Original target was March, but a major rewrite of the log checking software has caused a delay. SSB and CW WW results stayed on schedule but the RTTY rule
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00110.html (6,779 bytes)

324. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 09:43:43 -0700
Interesting perspective. Mine is different. Contests provide high activity for anyone to enjoy. In fact, the majority of unique calls worked in a contest are stations who are self-professed "non-cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00013.html (13,681 bytes)

325. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 11:01:51 -0700
The "robot" only checks a Cabrillo file for obvious formatting errors. It does not check for busted calls, busted exchanges or NILs. It checks that the contest dates and times are correct, that the m
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00015.html (9,832 bytes)

326. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:57:27 -0700
Simone, does (or, can) your log checking software produce a listing of how many times each station's sent exchange was (supposedly) busted by the other station? If so, a high percentage in this listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00031.html (17,764 bytes)

327. [RTTY] RTTY Contesting Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:13:33 -0700
It's time for another survey to quantify today's thinking on a variety of topics discussed here on the RTTY Contesting reflector. The last survey was conducted by Don AA5AU and me in February 2010: h
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00059.html (8,130 bytes)

328. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:31:54 -0700
This is an excellent and insightful evaluation. I am also very interested to see how GRITTY evolves. However, after thousands of (mostly) contest QSOs, I have seen many instances of each of the follo
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00064.html (10,648 bytes)

329. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:03:08 -0700
Agreed, although I ponder whether it would be "good" for RTTY contesting. Part of the skill, and fun, is quickly using multiple decoder windows to decide if there is good copy. Just like the CW conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00067.html (7,820 bytes)

330. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:19:22 -0700
1. Every contest has the potential to penalize the innocent when the exchange cross-check doesn't match due to an error on the sender's end. 2. If the exchange is the same for each QSO, then the log
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00093.html (10,738 bytes)

331. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:32:00 -0700
Ragchewing is the place to "care" about the QSO exchange and to send something "interesting". Contesting is a sport where the purpose of the exchange is to test our ability to send and copy accuratel
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00110.html (10,135 bytes)

332. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:14:53 -0700
Most of the time, yes, but not always. Especially, the SO2R ops will sometimes have out-of-sequence serial numbers. Avoid boredom and copy what the other guy sent and ask for a repeat if you aren't s
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00125.html (9,249 bytes)

333. [RTTY] Dayton Contest Dinner Table (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:29:20 -0700
There is one dinner ticket available at the W0YK reserved table for the Dayton Contest Dinner on Saturday evening at the Crowne Plaza. First request gets it, $39. So far: Ed W0YK Tom N3ZZ Roger N4RR
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00148.html (6,687 bytes)

334. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:35:50 -0700
I disagree that AFC should be on when running. I prefer AFC OFF all the time, so that I can choose where my VFO is tuned, rather than leaving that decision to my equipment. Ed W0YK -- ORIGINAL MESSAG
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00181.html (7,972 bytes)

335. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations [now, AFC ON or OFF?] (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:35:22 -0700
I want to know precisely the RF Mark frequency of stations I'm working. I prefer to see that frequency on my receiver VFO. I can quickly tell someone exactly how many Hz high or low they are, which m
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00194.html (11,086 bytes)

336. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:16:15 -0700
I think it is safe to assume that most, but maybe not all, stations you work will have USOS enabled. Therefore, your best odds are to have USOS enabled for both RX and TX at your station. No more ana
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00195.html (11,998 bytes)

337. [RTTY] RTTY Contesting Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:40:32 -0700
We invite everyone to take a quick survey on RTTY contesting. There are 23 multiple choice questions that are easy to answer in less than 5 minutes. The questions expand on the surveys done in 2007 a
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00200.html (8,139 bytes)

338. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:42:22 -0700
The Internet, and you folks, are scary. Literally 58 seconds after this posting was launched, the first survey taker hit the link and started answering questions. 10 minutes later, there were about 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00201.html (8,760 bytes)

339. Re: [RTTY] JT65 QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:44:28 -0700
K9YC has a lot of experience with this, I think. Ed W0YK ______________________________________________ HAS ANYONE HAD SUCCESS USING JT65 ON 1.840 MHZ 160 METERS? 73 de Jack / W7LD / "Lucky Dog" ____
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00025.html (7,285 bytes)

340. [RTTY] 2014 CQ WW RTTY Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 10:44:44 -0700
Results of the 2014 CQ WW RTTY Contest are (finally) available at www.cqwwrtty.com/results.htm. The searchable Scores Database on the same website will be updated shortly. Ed W0YK ___________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00045.html (7,816 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu