re my previous post http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00027.html IT9 is obviously not a DXCC (the rule says DXCC - not WAE or CQ country list) Therefore my final score is red
Bill Your supposition about cty file was right... Downloaded latest one and everything is OK now... Quoting f6irf@free.fr: _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@conte
Bill- I did not dream: Started a new tara log, and entered 4 qso's - result 4 mults, while 2 of them are WAE countries... Probably there is an explanantion somewhere, but can't see it right now... Fr
Hi RTTY'ers It has been a good one... had not worked 171 W's in a 24h one for quite some time (a dozen on 4 bands). Only 7 XE's (like last year), but for some reason it always looked more difficult t
Hi Jerry... Yes I know... Looking at Don's results, SO1R and SO2R results have obviously been mixed, without category indication. Wrote to Jose, XE1J, last week (en español), but no reply so f
Hi If you are connected to a DX-spider cluster (i.e. telnet) it is possible to accept only spots coming from your area (country, state or zone) and reject all others using the <accept/spot by> conmma
re: [RTTY] Updated AA5AU RTTY Contest Notes - XE and WPX contests RE: [RTTY] RTTY WPX OO4ADZ(ON4ADZ) SOAB LP "The most important thing in ham radio contesting is not to win but to take part, just as
Hi Phil, By the way what really surprises me is that some "popular but expensive software" can't even handle this properly after so many years! By chance some freeware does ;-) 0h8)N h-;3 ?33, 0)3-s
No Rick you did not miss anything... John, GW4SKA, even took a clear and strong position against power-classes here, some time ago... QUOTE I have always been against any form of high power / low po
Just forwarding an email from DL6RAI == Dear YL/OM: The results of the WAE DX Contest 2004 RTTY are finished and available on our Web site http://www.waedc.de. The winners are: Continent Single OP Si
I just published a few figures concerning "Olivia" measured performances versus a few other CGM's (PSK, RTTY, MFSK16. etc...) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oliviadata/message/87 Patrick F6IRF PS if y
Hi, Not MY 3dB rule; just a pure application of Shannon's theorem (see the link to K1JT page and consult WSJT ver3 manual at the last page) Please also read what I said about speed, bandwith efficien
Ty, Please note, that I did not mention that it was a good mode for contesting or Dx'peditionning... Like MFSK16, and due to FEC and interleaving, you need some time for the message you enter to appe
Hi, This is some information for Writelog users. Following a few emails exchanges I had with Dirk, ON4ADZ, Walter DL4RCK, and after reading WA9ALS page, I did some tests yesterday evening from our cl
Surprised that nobody mentionned yet the microham MK Everything from a USB-port... you can create as many virtual com-ports as you need, and do rig-control FSK CW and PTT from any software. as bonus
Don't want to enter the part of the debate specific to ARRL. Leave this to ARRL members... Just as an information: The most instructive document I found on Pactor utilization is the following one htt
Hi Chen Many thanks for pointing out Alex's work, which for some reason I had missed... Very interesting indeed... I have not tried true-TTY yet, but having played a lot with pathSim and MMTTY, I kn
Hi david the microham microkeyer does this (on top of the rest...) for CW and rtty http://www.microham.com/mk%20features.html ? FSK keying output - capable of sending 5/6/7/8 bits and 1/1.5/2 stop bi
Just back from a few days hollidays on the atlantic coast... SPDX RTTY Contest Call: F6IRF/P Operator(s): F6IRF Station: F6IRF/P Class: SOAB LP QTH: IN87 Operating Time (hrs): 19 Summary: Band QSOs P