Mail Archive Search: <+from:faunt@panix.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:faunt@panix.com: 234 ]

Total 234 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RTTY] RE: no rtty ops in Delaware (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:06:04 -0400 (EDT); Hm, Nebraska and Montana are usually pretty easy for me. I looked through my contest logs for the past few years, and only saw WA3GGM in the latest ANARTS contest (on 15M), so maybe he's new to RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00230.html (7,477 bytes)
122. Re: [RTTY] RE: no rtty ops in Delaware (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:51:50 -0400 (EDT); -> Have you guys tried PSK31? You can't get RTTY WAS with PSK 31. You *can* get Digital WAS with it, though, and I will, but I want to finish RTTY WAS first ... :-) This is a suprise for me. I think; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00239.html (8,321 bytes)
123. Re: [RTTY] RTTY YV0D (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:32:01 -0400 (EDT); If I'm the DX, please don't send me my own callsign when trying to get my attention in a pileup. It's just extra noise. All I want is your call. If you want to put my call (once) in your exchange, fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00030.html (8,482 bytes)
124. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Proposal to redefine subbands by bandwidth (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:14:02 -0400 (EDT); I think this is a false alarm. As it is now, the PIII stations could legally operate down in the PSK and RTTY segments, and PII MBO's already do. This would add restrictions to that. It also moves th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00128.html (9,460 bytes)
125. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft "Bandwidth"petition (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:51:41 -0400 (EDT); _________________________________________________________ I like it too. One small problem is we would no longer be able to use conventional RTTY in the JA RTTY segment on 80 (3520-3525). I think we; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00278.html (8,033 bytes)
126. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft"Bandwidth" petition (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:07:24 -0400 (EDT); Maybe we should ask for .065 (or maybe .070) as the lower limit for 500Hz BW on 15 and 10, as well as on 20, just to make things easier to remember? That would also preserve the status quo on 15M. Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00281.html (8,872 bytes)
127. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment ondraft "Bandwidth" petition (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:33:05 -0400 (EDT); .065 on 20m might be a hardship for the PSK31 folks. Whenever you change rules, it is going to make someone unhappy. I think we have to suggest tweeks that will make everyone less unhappy, if possibl; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00285.html (10,395 bytes)
128. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:33:51 -0400 (EDT); You need to read the whole proposal on the ARRL web site, but in fact, no change is suggested for 160M. 73, doug Very interesting there was no mention of the 160 meter band in the ARRL "Bandwidth" pe; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00316.html (7,360 bytes)
129. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC SCC RTTY Championship (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:25:56 -0400 (EDT); But so many of us have changed callsigns in recent years you can't always go by the exchange year. The callsign I am using was issued in '96 with the vanity upgrades, so I properly reported 1996, alt; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00349.html (8,751 bytes)
130. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial adapters (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:46:51 -0400 (EDT); hi John - I also don't want to sound mean - but I found reasons to be deeply disappointed in my fairly new Dell laptop, which was purchased because it was a model that had a serial port, not to menti; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00154.html (8,559 bytes)
131. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial adapters (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:34:55 -0400 (EDT); Nothing better than RCA connectors. What is the model of the Creative Card Doug? Jay It's an MP3+, and I got it in a package labled "Go!", which also included a reasonable pair of sound-canceling hea; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00156.html (8,092 bytes)
132. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:42:04 -0400 (EDT); I saw character strings in the noise that were probably you, but never got anything like a copyable call. If I'd been on a DXpedition, I'd have called you, though. The ones that make me laugh are the; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00263.html (8,819 bytes)
133. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP SOABLP CQWW (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:39:56 -0400 (EDT); We may be small, but we are loud :-) I had a blast running the contest, even if I was only running 50 watts into an inverted-V in the attic of my condo. I even managed to work KH7X for a new state ea; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00269.html (8,177 bytes)
134. [RTTY] N6TQS to T32QS (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:35:43 -0500 (EST); Hi All, As you may have read, I'm heading off to T32 next week, and will be operating on a casual basis, but will do RTTY, PSK31 and SSTV during the week; and will be in the ARRL 10M Contest on the f; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00003.html (6,877 bytes)
135. [RTTY] Re: [NCCC] T32 (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:20:11 -0500 (EST); Here's my additons. Here's the T32 report: Doug (N6TQS) and I with our respective XYLs arrived on Christmas Island on December 7. Christmas Island is a 5-hour flight by jet prop from Honolulu. The pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00116.html (10,206 bytes)
136. Re: [RTTY] VU4 RTTY (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:14:52 -0500 (EST); I'll go! I'll go!! 73, doug Don't think there's going to be any Baudot RTTY, though they've made some PSK QSOs. Guess the best we can hope for is the VU powers-that-be see that hamming from VU4 is OK; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00175.html (8,425 bytes)
137. Re: [RTTY] VU4 RTTY (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:14:57 -0500 (EST); I don't care if the ARRL counts it, I wouldn't personally claim it. That's my rule. I can understand the IOTA rule of giving you credit if you activate it, but DXCC is for working the DX yourself, IN; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00180.html (9,008 bytes)
138. Re: [RTTY] NV in RTTY RU (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:51:15 -0500 (EST); I worked W7TVF from Nevada during the practice, so there's hope. 73, doug I've been concerned about activity from NV during the RTTY RU. My rig's still in the shop (hope to have it back for the CQ 16; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00092.html (7,254 bytes)
139. [RTTY] N6TQS RTTY RU SOABLP Assisted (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:20:16 -0500 (EST); Not as good as last year- unfortunately, sometimes life, love and death get in the way of radio. 17 hours; 30,954 points 80 44 0 0 0 40 95 2 0 2 20 205 39 3 6 15 106 4 2 9 10 12 0 0 0 462 45 5 17 = 6; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00118.html (7,443 bytes)
140. Re: [RTTY] PSK Info (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:45:04 -0500 (EST); Some of us do. And, I've got to say, after listening to several days of rtty FSK, the ears do appreciate the change to PSK. And there are a bunch of clueful JA PSK ops. 73, doug Ty, Maybe some of the; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00202.html (8,077 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]