Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:faunt@panix.com: 234 ]

Total 234 documents matching your query.

141. [RTTY] RTTY and other digital modes with a DX-77? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
Hi All, I'll post a message with some interesting details about my trip on EUROPA later. Sorry I wasn't actually able to operate effectively from anyplace but the Falklands, but I learned a lot anywa
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00187.html (7,016 bytes)

142. [RTTY] Regrets Re: Second RTTY Gathering at HamRadio, Germany (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
Hi All, I have to send my regrets along, since I'll instead be going to CY9SS, St. Paul Island from 21 June to 7 July- http://www.cy9ss.com I do truly regret that circumstances are against my going t
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00045.html (9,008 bytes)

143. Re: [RTTY] KJ4QF North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 16:38:58 -0400 (EDT)
We at NN6NN saw the same thing, too. 73, doug I must have the same "asynchronous antenna", I experienced the exact same symptoms. Andy K3UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00161.html (7,520 bytes)

144. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
There are a some already: http://www.3905ccn.com/netsched.htm 73, doug Other than contests and DX I don't operate much RTTY (my spelling and typing sucks) but would like to get WAS RTTY. Is there or
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00257.html (7,344 bytes)

145. Re: [RTTY] [CTDXCC] JARTS-WW-RTTY 2005 AA5VU (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:50:54 -0400 (EDT)
Or perhaps RTTY is what you do when you forget CW :-) Or when you've risen above it. 73, doug _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00157.html (7,569 bytes)

146. Re: [RTTY] Age (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
Russ, WA3FRP wrote: "I wonder what will happen when we are 88!" Personally, I look forward to any/all age that is above the one I'm fortunate to have. Hopefully, someday, I'll be able to send a "thre
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00176.html (7,563 bytes)

147. Re: [RTTY] Novel idea? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:43:48 -0500 (EST)
I can't see a problem.. except, maby the rotor cable on the upper rotor may get large doses of RF while it passes between the A3S a simple fix could be sheilded cable.. Tony NN1D Another fix for this
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00168.html (12,097 bytes)

148. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:09:22 -0500 (EST)
Yes. If you can copy two signals on two different "channels", you should enter as 2R. I hate to use the word "channels" with amateur radio, but it fits. A RTTY channel is no more than 300 Hz wide. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00198.html (10,345 bytes)

149. Re: [RTTY] Friedrichshafen 2006! (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:18:12 -0500 (EST)
So, waht are the dates this year? 73, doug Hi all, Just to remind you all that now is a good time to think about going to the Ham Radio event in Friedrichshafen, Germany, this year. If you need any a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00054.html (8,101 bytes)

150. [RTTY] W2JGR (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:53:47 -0500 (EST)
I was pleased to have lunch with Jules when I was in Minneapolis a few years back, and to have him point out his tower from my hotel room window. He'd already been missed on the air, and his death ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00248.html (6,688 bytes)

151. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:21:18 -0500 (EST)
I have little business commenting on QSLing, because I'm WAY behind, just because of "life". But I did want to comment on this: Tom, Im with you on this and I too have received numerous qsl cards fol
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00585.html (8,312 bytes)

152. Re: [RTTY] Suburban Lot 160 Meter Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:54:50 -0500 (EST)
So, I'd be interested in operating on 160M, but I have a lot that's just 140'long and 40' wide and the house covers almost all of the front half of the lot, although I've got antenna supports at eac
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00030.html (7,411 bytes)

153. Re: [RTTY] VP8DIN RTTY QSL? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:33:35 -0500 (EST)
Nobody has gotten a VP8DIN QSL. I've been going through a divorce, and other personal problems. Sorry, doug N6TQS/VP8DIN Anyone had luck getting VP8DIN QSL from Feb. 2005? I sent QSL to manager but n
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00102.html (7,306 bytes)

154. [RTTY] Off to VU4 this morning (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
Hi all, I'm off to VU4 this morning. I'll be putting my impressions, etc. up on my blog, http://n6tqs.livejournal.com/ , as opportunity presents itself, if you're interested. 73, doug N6TQS/VU3RYN __
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00084.html (6,413 bytes)

155. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:03:58 -0400 (EDT)
Err, the 756PROIII weighs just about the same as the 746PRO, (21+ vs 20-) and is a more capable radio. They're also just about the same volume, too. 73, doug I personally would go with IC-746pros. Fu
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00127.html (9,703 bytes)

156. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:27:23 -0400 (EDT)
I was just addressing weight and volume issues. Yes, the 746PRO is a cheaper radio. And has 2M, also. But it's not significantly lighter or smaller than a 756PROIII, and isn't, in my opinion, as good
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00134.html (10,059 bytes)

157. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
Just two throw my two bits in again I think the definitive part of SO2R is that you can RECEIVE WHILE TRANSMITTING. That means multiple-receive-channel radios or software is not enough. 73, doug Simp
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00236.html (7,228 bytes)

158. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
It seems like after every contests we have the same complaints. Last time it was the QRP'er and their freq. Lets not forget the guy that was passing traffic on 7.055. Now next month is the CQWWPHONE
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00140.html (8,367 bytes)

159. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:40:29 -0400 (EDT)
C'mon guys. It IS the beacon frequency, and they ARE useful. They'd even be useful to a contester in a contest if the frequency were free, and if you had either automated monitoring, or another pair
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00156.html (9,240 bytes)

160. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:55:33 -0400 (EDT)
Doug, Just as the ARRL has recognized changes in band usage and moved their bulletin transmissions over time, the IARU "beacons" need to be moved OUT of the heavily used digital spectrum or accept QR
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00159.html (9,678 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu