Mail Archive Search: <+from:faunt@panix.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:faunt@panix.com: 234 ]

Total 234 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:04:32 -0400 (EDT); I use them all the time, but I don't see their frequency as sacred. Anybody, including you, me or the IARU can set up a band plan. Only if it is adopted by the FCC or your country's equivalent does i; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00178.html (10,450 bytes)
162. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:23:29 -0400 (EDT); So would I. BTW, I have donated a rig and cash to the NCDXF for the beacon system, and support for RTTY on funded DXpeditions; and my current operating program of choice, MixW, has great support for; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00180.html (10,695 bytes)
163. Re: [RTTY] 80M RTTY (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:50:25 -0400 (EDT); This is a good question, in more then one way JT. Now that the FCC has reallocated the 80M Extra voice band, the extra 80M OF's will be drooling all over the place. And although you can do CW in the; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00108.html (8,676 bytes)
164. Re: [RTTY] ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:08:32 -0400 (EDT); There's probably some reality to their statement, too. Many DXpeditions rate RTTY with 6 meters and EME, and those groups DO provide support out of proportion to the number of QSO's made, as far as I; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00208.html (8,549 bytes)
165. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:33:18 -0400 (EDT); Sheesh, I'll offer myself with a complete set of gear from computer to antenna, if it'll help. But unless you can offer a new band that the CW and 'phone ops don't want that'll still work, ... Often; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00231.html (7,851 bytes)
166. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:55:28 -0400 (EDT); Yeah. I got them easily, and then discovered I was using the 40M rotatable dipole end-on to them! Of course, they're almost in my back yard as far as DX goes. 73, doug They have been on 17m RTTY for; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00237.html (8,670 bytes)
167. Re: [RTTY] Thanks to 3C0M Operator (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:10:50 -0400 (EDT); This is a project that seems to be able to provide the band scope functionality to many radios. Unfortunately, it may be a one-of and the subscription period has long gone. http://www.cliftonlaborato; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00377.html (9,979 bytes)
168. Re: [RTTY] Thanks to 3C0M Operator (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:21:28 -0400 (EDT); Because I'm tired of messing with computers. Truly, the SDR recievers are the way to go, but I can barely face a contesting program these days. 73, doug Buy? Why not build your own? A SoftRock SDR ki; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00382.html (7,804 bytes)
169. Re: [RTTY] VU7RG Operation (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:37:34 -0500 (EST); I can state that it's going to happen. 73, doug N6TQS, VU3RYN, etc... Does anyone know if the VU7RG operation (http://www.vu7.in/) is still going to occur as announced, starting on Jan 15, 2007, or h; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00050.html (7,035 bytes)
170. [RTTY] Hints peculiar to N1MM? (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:18:19 -0500 (EST); Hi all, I'm going to be on for a bit this time, with N1MM, and wonder if anyone's got hints for things that are peculiar to N1MM. It seems to be working well, so far, and I've got the macros pretty m; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00061.html (7,342 bytes)
171. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] RTTY WPX - A heads-up (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:22:24 -0500 (EST); Why? And another thing they forgot to mention on the ARRL web page: 40 meter operation in the WPX RTTY is highly discouraged from 01Z-03Z Sunday (Saturday evening in the USA). This would be a good ti; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00071.html (7,525 bytes)
172. Re: [RTTY] RTTY COEXISTING WITH PSK (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:41:38 -0500 (EST); Hi all, I agree, if I'm distorting, wherever I am, tell me. High power, per se, isn't really a problem, it's overdrive that's the issue. I've got a rather curmudgeonly article at the DX Magazine abou; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00243.html (8,394 bytes)
173. Re: [RTTY] USOS (Unshift on Space) in Writelog (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:53:53 -0500 (EST); It is very simple to translate the unshifted number back to a number in Writelog. If the report is 599 QWE QWE all you have to do is "shift click" on the QWE to get 123 and it will put it in the exch; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00257.html (8,132 bytes)
174. Re: [RTTY] cw action (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:49:50 -0500 (EST); No- two wrongs don't make a right. 73, doug _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00313.html (6,366 bytes)
175. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Usage (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:43:07 -0400 (EDT); Well, in "A Phone Of Their Own", mention is made that W6NRM was copying RTTY and petioned the FCC for "radioteletype operation on a broader range of frequencies" in January 1951. W6NRM was Robert H.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00066.html (6,909 bytes)
176. Re: [RTTY] RTTY History (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:52:58 -0400 (EDT); IIRC, hams used RTTY with on-off keying before FSK was allowed to them. See my earlier post quoting from "A Phone Of Their Own", which gives dates earlier than 1953. And my memory say that AFSK was u; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00068.html (7,751 bytes)
177. Re: [RTTY] RTTY History (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:16:32 -0400 (EDT); To follow up my own post There was activity on 2M in 1946 in LA and "on the east coast", where AFSK was allowed. There was what he calls "Make-and-break keying" on HF, too. So RTTY operation was star; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00069.html (7,215 bytes)
178. Re: [RTTY] N8S changing software (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:00:25 -0400 (EDT); Do you really think the CW ops would let the digi guys anywhere near their 160 antenna? In short no. We only have 5 on 80M, too. They could stay up longer then we could, even if we did build a very n; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00205.html (8,689 bytes)
179. Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:44:42 -0400 (EDT); I used to send the whole range, and even change it as the pileup got smaller, but decided that the top end was no necssary. I'm no longer sure of that, and changed back to a full definition. I think; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00211.html (9,220 bytes)
180. [RTTY] New radio from Elecraft, the K3, looks REALLY good for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:41:24 -0400 (EDT); Hi all, You may be unaware of that Elecraft has unveiled a new radio, the K3. The relevance here is that it appears that ALL the deficiencies of the K2 for RTTY have been remedied in the K3, and it s; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00266.html (7,490 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]