Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g3yyd@btinternet.com: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

81. [RTTY] WAE RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 04:58:43 -0500
Never done this contest before. So practiced with QTC before the contest, which helped but still took a few QTC exchanges before it became more natural. I made 1166 Qs all together with rates peaking
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00121.html (8,222 bytes)

82. [RTTY] 2Tone Update on new technique (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:06:13 -0500
During the WAE RTTY contest John GW0SKA and I made about 1100 Qs each. Independently both of us thought that about 4% of the Qs were improved due to the new technique. The new technique being to make
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00127.html (7,645 bytes)

83. Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:24:28 -0500
Lee It will be wider than a 2Tone DOOK transmission. You do not need a spectrum analyser to find out just another reasonable receiver with nothing plugged into the antenna socket, with attenuator in
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00134.html (8,855 bytes)

84. Re: [RTTY] Your thoughts wanted on a idea. (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:30:37 -0500
That is doing it the easy way. Try doing WAS from EU on RTTY. I just checked and I have 50 on 20m, 47 on 15m (need AZ, Hi & OR) and 42 on 10m. On the lower bands got 33 on 40m and 14 on 80m. The low
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00138.html (8,713 bytes)

85. [RTTY] 2Tone update released (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:21:39 -0500
I have just uploaded a new version of 2Tone. It can be found here: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/N1MMLoggerplus/files/G3YYD/ And no doubt Don (thank you) will upload it in due course to: http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00142.html (8,713 bytes)

86. Re: [RTTY] Got my tone problem fixed. (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:01:32 -0500
Probably it was a corrupted .ini file. If this happens again just go to the MMTTY folder and delete everything that is a .ini. Then set up again. Remember not to put RTTY software into Program Files
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-12/msg00088.html (9,201 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] Ten Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 12:28:11 -0500
Ray BARTG contests are handicapped in that if you do well in a previous BARTG contest then you have to be in the expert category. This is "experts" compete against each other leaving room for the les
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-12/msg00090.html (7,440 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] Upside-down RTTY contest QSO's (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:56:40 -0500
I have a simple solution. If someone does this then I ignore them and carry on CQ or work another caller. Ok I may lose a Q but it is the only quick way to educate someone. I find ignoring them is es
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00093.html (9,170 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Fatigue (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:17:08 -0500
I use closed back headphones with foam ear plugs for RTTY contesting. This reduces the fan noise from the amplifiers enabling low level of RTTY tones. The reduction in fatigue is well worth it for su
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00158.html (8,753 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 05:12:42 -0500
In the UK we have a local 80m evening contest that runs monthly for data modes. Both modes PSK and RTTY are used in this contest and to make a good score both modes have to be used. PSK31 (note the 3
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00200.html (10,757 bytes)

91. [RTTY] BARTG Macros and 2Tone (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:00:54 -0500
Take into account how 2Tone combines strings sent twice in succession to produce when required an improved decode. It is better to program the macros like this illustration from N1MMplus: F2 Exch,{TX
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00043.html (7,817 bytes)

92. Re: [RTTY] K3S with AFSK (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:27:53 -0500
Jim I use K3 with the "old" style interface. I have two K3. I have always used low tone AFSK well actually 2Tone DOOK as it performs slightly better (0.4dB) than AFSK and is narrower too. I listened
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00067.html (8,627 bytes)

93. Re: [RTTY] One Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:47:13 -0500
Sometime this happens because the guy has his logging software set for RUN. So he enters your call and sends you call and the exchange. If his software was on S&P then he would just send his call ent
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00029.html (9,113 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] Decoding troubles after taking a break (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:44:37 -0500
Actually 2Tone does not care what sampling rate that Windows default is set at. It will always use 48K for decode and uses the Windows API to set it at that for its sample rate. It decimates this int
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00046.html (11,713 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] One Pet Peeve - Unskilled SO2R Operators (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:21:23 -0500
There is always the hidden QRM. You don't hear it but he does and so can't hear you. Then there is the guy who calls you then sends unnecessary guff so prolonging the RX time. While on the other band
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00072.html (10,845 bytes)

96. Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:14:11 -0500
75 Baud does require as you would expect wider filters, which means signal to noise ratio is 2.2 dB lower than the same signal at 45.45 baud. This may not sound much but on a marginal signal the diff
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00015.html (10,283 bytes)

97. Re: [RTTY] RTTY frequencies to avoid (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:43:56 -0500
Jeff What is the likely USA 80m frequency segment that will be used? Any hints on how UK might avoid very congested segments would be helpful. 73 David G3YYD aka M7T in contests I was asked to provid
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00032.html (8,372 bytes)

98. Re: [RTTY] RTTY frequencies to avoid (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:26:13 -0500
Jeff Thank you. Europe in general uses 3580 to 3620 for RTTY but it will spread higher and lower during peak occupancy. I would expect EU to move below 3570 at peak times. Asians often go below 3580
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00034.html (10,601 bytes)

99. [RTTY] CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:03:02 -0500
I use a call history file which contains most of the active US RTTY contesters with state and zone being prefilled on the entry window (N1MM+). Have to be careful they have not moved but majority hav
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00054.html (8,612 bytes)

100. [RTTY] New Radio (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:18:35 -0500
Always worth looking at Bob Sherwood's table for RX performance http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Before making one's mind up what to buy. 73 David G3YYD I've been looking closely at the IC-7300 mys
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00077.html (8,710 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu