Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gillie@pa.net: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] rules for OK-OM (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:48:29 -0500
Seli, I believe you are looking at the wrong set of rules. Make sure you are looking at OKDX RTTY. For RTTY, the exchange is RST and CQ Zone. _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00236.html (7,886 bytes)

2. [RTTY] OK RTTY K3SV SOAB Low (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:02:57 -0500
Bill K3SV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00255.html (7,346 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:36:00 -0500
It's as easy as that! Cool huh! I have over 21k qso's at LOTW, some as old as 1980, The QSL rate via LOTW is over 33 percent. Amazing. 73 Bill K3SV Now that's cool! Someone (an Excel wizard) came up
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00443.html (10,604 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:26:45 -0500
I've had a few inquiries about my 33 percent QSL rate. Let me break it down a little bit. If you look back to the older QSO's, the rate of confirmation via LOTW is very low, however, as you get into
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00444.html (12,630 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] WAS RTTY #677 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:02:04 -0500
RTTY #674, all confirmed via LOTW. 73 Bill K3SV -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00002.html (10,565 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] FT5GA on LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:11:20 -0400
My FT5GA qso's are on LOTW also. Must have completed the upload. 73 Bill K3SV -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00189.html (8,860 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] anyone work TX4T (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:00:15 -0500
I worked a TX4T on 15 meters during the contest. Don't see any RTTY entries in their online logbook. Wait and see. 73 K3SV -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00128.html (7,723 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:18:10 -0500
I thing I notice, more and more, is ops that are too impatient. CQ CQ and listen for 2 seconds, or when you don't come back in a nano second they go into panic mode. Maybe slowing down is not a bad t
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00147.html (9,990 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Dentron GLA-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:46:19 -0400
I watched a demo of the GLA-1000 when they first hit the scene. To demonstrate how "sensitive" the tubes were the technician put the key down and in 20 seconds the tubes were "toast". Use caution on
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00070.html (11,130 bytes)

10. [RTTY] Rhode Island Needed for Last One (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:25:59 -0500
Looking for sched with RI station on RTTY, PSK for my last one in digital for Triple Play. Any band/mode. 80/40 most likely. tnx 73 Bill K3SV _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00004.html (6,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu