- 1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1)
- Author: "Howard Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:31:45 -0400
- As I read the ARRL proposal, the *Entire" 160m band can be blanketed by automated Pactor-III robots of 2400 Hz width, without limitation. Can anybody show me where this is incorrect? Current rules: &
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00389.html (9,263 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] Winlink wants YOUR frequencies! (score: 1)
- Author: "Skip Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:04:57 -0400
- The following was posted on www.zerobeat.net. Please read carefully and send comments to bandwidth@arrl.org. Failure to do may result in PSK31 operations being forced down into the CW regions of the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00022.html (14,235 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1)
- Author: "Skip Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:40:29 -0400
- "As an ARRL Director and a member of the ARRL Board Executive Committee that is studying the issue of a "Regulation by Bandwidth Proposal" I feel I must correct some of your blatant errors in fact."
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00101.html (11,662 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: "Skip Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:45:07 -0400
- The ARRL Executive Committee has just published the proposed ARRL petition to segment the bands by bandwidth instead of by mode. You can read the news release here: http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/st
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00113.html (7,552 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] The Email Robots are coming to RTTY! (score: 1)
- Author: "Skip Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:31:03 -0400
- ARRL is petitioning the FCC to allow Email Robots to take over the HF bands under 10m. You can read about the special meeting with the FCC here: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hteller/11306-cont.pdf I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00191.html (8,723 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu