- 1. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1)
- Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:07:04 +0000
- Hello Kh-phillips, Yes. I worked them on 40m on feb 24th but I am not in their online log. The next contact they made was with another italian station and that contact appears in the online log so I'
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00352.html (8,371 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:36:20 +0100
- Hello Bill, I don't think that Sprint Contest approach is the best one. I fail to understand how you can find a clear frequency in a FT5ZM-like case. I have been monitoring the pileup on their split
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00101.html (9,642 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:34:03 +0100
- Hello Bill, If your radio has a narrow 250 Hz filter you can probably accomodate 4 strong signals per kHz. If a DXpedition is going to use your RTTY sub band entirely on 20m, say from 14080 to 14150,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00108.html (10,429 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 19:33:35 +0100
- Hello Bill, I am not sure there is. I have always used the split method since I was licensed in mid 90s, I guess if there was a better way someone in the past had already proposed it. If I was at the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00122.html (9,691 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:25:22 +0100
- Hello Kai, QYF Take over traffic instead of my station. You can find the complete code here: http://www.astrosol.ch/downloads/qzcodescis.doc Steve IK4WMH _____________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00124.html (9,969 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu