- 81. [RTTY] 47th A. VOLTA RTTY Contest 2015 (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:37:15 +0200
- Hi all. As I didn't see any notice here, just to make anybody informed ... There are the officials results for the VOLTA 2015:. http://www.contestvolta.com/ Enjoy. CUAGN 73 de iw1ayd Salvo PS I'd rec
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00114.html (6,966 bytes)
- 82. Re: [RTTY] RTTY frequencies (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 09:41:06 +0200
- Hi all, those are the right arguments and it's desirable to adhere to this de facto standard, as Joe wrote. It's not a de jure or a technical standard as who is operating "whistling modes" there had
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-08/msg00000.html (9,145 bytes)
- 83. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:14:53 +0200
- Hi all. Not to look more silly of what I am, but ... It seems to me that this trending discovery of responders as CQers is happening much more since the introduction of the new RTTY skimmer. At least
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00177.html (10,372 bytes)
- 84. [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:32:48 +0200
- Oh YES Lee! All this make it very clear, I suppose that from who is the originator of the entry there could be applied any further check about the skimmer in use. Perhaps what seemed to me is wrong .
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00001.html (11,487 bytes)
- 85. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:34:33 +0200
- Hi Larry. Yes, you are right. But I was supposing/speculating, maybe wrongly, that the latest RTTY skimmer is a little bit more prone to that kind of error. It seemed to me that the DL4RCK RTTY wasn'
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00008.html (15,953 bytes)
- 86. Re: [RTTY] JARTS WW RTTY Contest this weekend (score: 1)
- Author: Salvo <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:10:18 +0200
- Hi Hisami san and all. We will be there operating from our club station @iq1ry premises, but not alone this year. We will it as a Multi effort with the call of IW1QN. Operators will be IW1QN, Federic
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00075.html (7,451 bytes)
- 87. Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:05:55 +0200
- Not even being such a good DXer or Contest operator. But doing those last events almost anytime as assisted I wouldn't care at all of the second digit on RTTY spots. A well known part of the S&P is t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00087.html (18,440 bytes)
- 88. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RBN stats (Tomi kallio) (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:36:53 +0200
- Nice work Tomi TU. Side-notes may occur, but not to criticize UR effort Tomi, believe me. Pro Some degrees of end user filtering are still permitted by the app and also by the site. That's good. Cons
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00104.html (9,081 bytes)
- 89. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RBN stats (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 22:39:37 +0200
- Well Dai san. You don't need to ask for excuses. Mine rant was really as slicing a air in four ... callsign rules and how they apply over time are a nightmare. BTW you have 4 errors over 62 right cat
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00107.html (13,505 bytes)
- 90. Re: [RTTY] N1MM Logger+ RTTY macro question (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:29:13 +0100
- Hi Dick, by now with ESM engaged the result for an answer when in QSO is the content of F5 and F2 together. F5 couldn't be disengaged, any Fx key must be assigned to HIS_CALL, no way to say NO to thi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00030.html (11,854 bytes)
- 91. [RTTY] RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:11:40 +0100
- Yes Jim, you right but there are alternative(s), isn't? First of all anyone have to change the way as to send out back his call more times depending when, in a QSO, we get the clue that the other end
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00119.html (13,102 bytes)
- 92. Re: [RTTY] Flex RTTY AFSK Only (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:26:25 +0100
- Hi Chen and others. I could empirically confirm conclusion from what you wrote Chen. I owned some ICOM transceiver, a flex 3000, and now a small batch of K3. Not anyway thinking to move on K3s. The T
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00158.html (15,980 bytes)
- 93. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:46:14 +0100
- just in case that someone had lost it or need a pointer to http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/rtty-length/?msg=&stop_bits=1&usos=1&mode=RTTY 73 de iw1ayd Salvo _______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00228.html (8,178 bytes)
- 94. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
- Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:12:51 +0100
- Well ... Hank please consider what I am writing here down. Phil please don't go that much further. Even small pills, just 10 S&P contest QSO, may have positive effects. We all have meters in front of
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00248.html (16,125 bytes)
- 95. [RTTY] Re Gary AL9A (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:07:57 +0100
- Sad news. I was listening his aurora diddling signal on quite each contest @IQ1RY. Not that much of history as others, but still my slice of it. Him was that presence that make me happy and greetings
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00063.html (6,911 bytes)
- 96. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:16:38 +0100
- Hi all. Being interested to decoders and trying to learning what would apply all round I have rediscovered GRITTY. Well, I placed it in use again. Now I have 4 decoders. But leaving out the master fu
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00132.html (9,628 bytes)
- 97. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:35:30 +0100
- Hi all. I would never end a CQ with a CR or a CRLF. I have a CRLF that print only in locally, after the switching to RX, for my view. But the practice of ending a CQ with a CR or CRLF was strongly de
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00168.html (30,278 bytes)
- 98. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer - DF4UE (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:34:56 +0100
- Hi Pete, Lee and all. This was and is the RCKSkimmer made by Walter DL4RCK: http://www.walter-dallmeier.de/software-by-dl4rck/rckskimmer/ I didn't have the tooling since then to observe statistically
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00181.html (9,588 bytes)
- 99. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 159, Issue 43 (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:10:32 +0100
- Hi all. I wouldn't ask QRZ at the end of TU: I am free to take any other call, CQ, not just the caller I know that is there but I am not sure of his call, QRZ. The software MUST be done as to clever
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00183.html (38,384 bytes)
- 100. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:55:00 +0200
- Hi Matt. I agree: GRITTY seems a well made companion when things become hard on a single QRG. Taking care to have to have a 500 Hz or more wide filter. Wider will not have any meaning when pointing t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00308.html (10,381 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu