Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:iw1ayd@googlemail.com: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Sneak Preview of fldigi-3.21 (Signal Browser for, RTTY) (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:17:02 +0100
Well, also I would concur on what Richard and Chen wrote, absolutely. Yes, it useful to have something like the B VFO with a different filter, widest i.e., than the A VFO. As switching on the pile up
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00089.html (10,193 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Radio IC7600 vs IC700 vs FT5000 (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:18:05 +0200
Yes. The plain answer to that question, LA6FJA, is yes. There is the a 3 time pushing actions, just fiddling buttons to enable the TPF with the 250 Hz filter for the 7600 and for the 7700. To move fr
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00068.html (11,011 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] ZC4LI (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:25:41 +0200
Ciao Steve, I hope you will recover soon and better than before. Get well Steve! Ciao & 73 de iw1ayd Salvo _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00091.html (7,347 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Mark & Space - High Tones (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:36:11 +0200
Phil, may I say: yes. ! space mark zero beat mark space ! The mark is anyway the nearest tone to the suppressed carrier zero beat frequency. The readout on radio may change but this is the picture. 7
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00055.html (9,119 bytes)

5. [RTTY] CU all on NAQP (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:01:23 +0200
Hi all. As the IQ1RY premises are free for this weekend we would like to participate to the NAQP as a Multi-Operator Two-Transmitter station operating from the there. The call in use will be IW1AYD f
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00094.html (7,922 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:49:55 +0200
Hi all, just my two cents note trow in ... .TU OTHER-ONE IW1AYD CQ <110717 TI:ME:NO RX> ? W4HOD/O W4HOD/0 N A <110717 TI:ME:NO TX> .W4HOD/0 MYEXCHANGE W4HOD/0 <110717 TI:ME:NO RX> Much better with th
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00154.html (8,932 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:18:43 +0200
Hi Chen and all, I already have those fonts, not the Ounava but the Monaco on several M*S W*S PC's here around. Great suggestions, TNX My note on to get it written or visible was related to the pure
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00162.html (12,279 bytes)

8. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY - July (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:08:41 +0200
Call: IW1AYD Operator(s): IZ1TNL IW1AYD Station: IW1AYD Class: M/2 LP QTH: Bra (CN) Operating Time (hrs): 12 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 40: 81 32 20: 283 50 -- Total: 364 82 Total Score = 30,576 Gre
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00199.html (9,904 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Booooo Boooo Boooo (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:10:12 +0200
What does it mean? Why they have become Digital as any piece of electronic junk out there? Please could somebody elaborate more than me and add some explication on the why and what about this news. W
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00217.html (7,028 bytes)

10. [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:32:16 +0200
Hi to all. Just to read the doc abou and not my personal opinion go there: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Board%20Meetings/2011%20Second%20MeetingMinutes%281%29.pdf ( Take care of the UR
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00021.html (10,951 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:32:22 +0200
TU Jim, W7RY. I will wait for any response from there with real interests. The move to point him here is also very well done. I have tried, just when the notice hit here the first time, to wrote at t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00050.html (16,390 bytes)

12. [RTTY] 45th ed. A. Volta Contest MO plaque IQ1RY (score: 1)
Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:25:34 +0200
The recent happenings have cluttered my desk a little bit. I was forgetting a serious thing that I would like to share with you all, as several of you where there on air: I know! All my personal than
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00052.html (7,908 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Easter Island on now (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:44:11 +0200
That fellow on the Easter island, I2DMI, is the A. Volta RTTY contest manager! Give him a call, he will deserve it and more. Unfortunately my dipole would not be enough but his is not a valid issue n
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00084.html (7,028 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Looks like I won't get RTTY DXCC afterall (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:42:10 +0200
TU for the info Peter. Unluckily it's sad to know. So the real DXCC for RTTY is gone. God Save the King But let we smile about. For sure I wouldn't apply for a DXCC made by this way of working Digita
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00123.html (8,156 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:42:48 +0200
Hi all. BTW also FLDIGI does the same as I2DMI, Francesco, showed us with MMVARI. It seems a little bit more hard to set by levels and, well, squelch .... still inside N1MM. I have the hope that this
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00144.html (8,751 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:25:36 +0200
How to say, plainly I think: Don, you get the point, that's it! DX'ing/Contesting/Anything-to-do-with-ham-radio. 73 de iw1ayd Salvo PS ;-> I am not a subject matter expert, but just one of the addict
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00169.html (9,152 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] CE0Y/I2DMI video (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:31:21 +0200
G'day Mike. The MMVARI standalone kit have some multichannel provision but it is not so well shining as the version seen in the Franc video. Having a look a the page ... http://hamsoft.ca/pages/progr
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00182.html (8,350 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:50:55 +0200
Hello to all. Just few notes from the desk here. I agreed and still agree silently with Fabi VA2UP and Bill W6WRT. I appreciated their words and I would stay silent but sometimes I couldn't resist .
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00223.html (10,328 bytes)

19. [RTTY] WAS RTTY done from LOTW . (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:12 +0100
TNX! I would like to thanks all who had the patience to answer my calls or to call me back. I finally reached the RTTY WAS target as tracked by the LOTW site. Last but not least there was the QSO wit
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-11/msg00080.html (7,230 bytes)

20. [RTTY] SARTG WW 2011 result published. (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:06:03 +0100
Thanks a lot Ewe. That was a very great time! We enjoyed a lot at IQ1RY, Mario, IK1HXN, and me. Than and now. But also a lot of other OM's judging on the numbers. Hope to be there next year. With a l
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00132.html (7,130 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu