Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@n7us.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] MARS mode above 4 MHZ? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:30:12 -0700
What digital mode does MARS use above 4 MHz? Just curious? Jim N7US _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00252.html (6,149 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] MARS mode above 4 MHZ? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:24:15 -0700
The answer seems to be all of them. I was told: Pactor Pactor II GTOR Packet Clover Baudot 75 baud PSK31 No wonder it's challenging to be an SWL there. Thanks, all. Jim N7US -- Original Message -- Fr
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00259.html (7,413 bytes)

23. [RTTY] Attn RTTY ops (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:06 -0700
Terry, AB5K, the AR-Cluster developer, and I are trying an intercom among RTTY ops on the cluster. We set up a "regional announcement filter" named, aptly enough, RTTY. An announcement sent in the fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00288.html (7,315 bytes)

24. [RTTY] Cluster A/RTTY with DXbase 2005 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 04:18:39 -0700
Jack, AA4LU, was just getting ready to finalize the new release when we started using AR-Cluster's special regional announce feature for RTTY announcements. As a beta tester, I sent him a note about
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00000.html (6,952 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] KAM Plus and MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 20:28:30 -0700
Pete, The KAM Plus and MMTTY are redundant. You can run both with the receiver audio fed to both in case you want to determine which will copy better (I'll save you the time, it'll be MMTTY). MMTTY w
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00041.html (7,865 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Dayton WX (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:38:21 -0700
Maybe "Dayton" should be held in Phoenix (after September and before May). That's a bit tongue in cheek (does that make any sense to anyone outside the US?), but we actually are going to have an ARRL
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00094.html (11,061 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] 160M RTTY (or any other band for that matter) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:35:32 -0700
Don, I responded on the cluster with a TALK message (what node do you connect to?) and an A/RTTY but got no response from you. I have a few minutes. What frequency? Jim N7US The bands are open (I can
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00108.html (7,877 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] 160M is open (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 20:11:02 -0700
160 is generally (always?) "open," but the most common limiting factor is noise, and this is a lousy time for 160 here unless one has a good, low noise receiving antenna. I can barely hear some activ
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00154.html (7,285 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] 160M is open (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:39:37 -0700
The Topband reflector is an excellent source of information and help. Several extremely knowledgeable members are always offering operating, propagation, and antenna help. It's at http://lists.contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00162.html (11,360 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] RIGrunner? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 09:32:18 -0700
I'll contribute to the semi-RTTY related discussion. I have an MFJ DC strip with banana jacks but am thinking of switching everything over to the Powerpoles. Most 12V stuff runs off of power supplies
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00205.html (9,043 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] RTTY YV0D (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:04:14 -0700
Despite a solid signal from him, I eventually was successful for a new one on RTTY. There was a lot of luck involved. Jim N7US I came to the same conclusion. I sat and listened for about a half hour
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00050.html (9,779 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Distortion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:56:07 -0700
Don, I have a PROII now but previously had an MP and then a MARK V. I used both with a RIGblaster Plus and then a Pro and then a HB interface, all on FSK (or the internal AFSK generator to be precise
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00246.html (11,122 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Distortion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 06:01:53 -0700
Don, I agree that you shouldn't change it if you're happy. The Plus is either CW or FSK but not both. The Pro does do both, and it does have RS-232 in and out if the radio uses that for control, whic
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00260.html (14,817 bytes)

34. [RTTY] RTTY with Ten-Tec Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:45:24 -0700
I asked this question at the beginning of this year but the response was limited. I'd like to hear of experiences with RTTY with the Ten-Tec Orion. Ease of use? Bandwidths? Compatibility with MMTTY a
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00364.html (6,309 bytes)

35. RE: external DSP audio filters (was Re: [RTTY] AA5AU ContestNotes forCQWW RTTY now on-line) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 06:33:27 -0700
Has anyone compared the Timewave 599ZX to the NIR-12? Jim N7US --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Pixton Sent: Saturday, Oc
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00026.html (14,028 bytes)

36. [RTTY] HAL P38 for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:14:25 -0700
Anyone interested in a HAL P38? It requires an ISA slot and does ASCII, BAUDOT, AMTOR, CLOVER-II, AND P-Mode (that's HAL for Pactor). HAL is still selling them reduced from the regular price if $295
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00370.html (6,580 bytes)

37. RE: [RTTY] ritty available? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:35:38 -0700
As anyone been successful in getting RITTY to work with any other sound cards? Jim N7US The best way to obtain ritty (the only way) is to contact Brian K6STI via snail mail (qrz.com). I have a copy I
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00374.html (8,051 bytes)

38. RE: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 09:03:37 -0700
Why not float these ideas for a 160 RTTY contest on the Topband reflector? Jim N7US Floyd et all, Happy New Year 2005 to all! Whether we are talking "regions" or countries/entities the end result is
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00003.html (13,062 bytes)

39. RE: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:48:47 -0700
As an occasional, casual RTTY contester who also enjoys DXing on 160 meters, I'd prefer not to have RTTY contests there. 160 is the most challenging band below 30 MHz due to the propagation, which re
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00012.html (17,626 bytes)

40. RE: [RTTY] Broadbanded 160 Meter Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:34:32 -0700
Why not just use a transmatch from the shack to tune the existing 160 antenna? I have an Ameritron ATR-30 that I've been very happy with, and so has my 87A. Jim N7US The Conical Monopole antenna also
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00040.html (9,750 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu